Suppr超能文献

高流量鼻导管氧疗与常规氧疗在术后患者中的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy compared with conventional oxygen therapy in postoperative patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e027523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027523.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on the reintubation rate, rate of escalation of respiratory support and clinical outcomes in postextubation adult surgical patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Index and Wan fang databases were searched up to August 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies in postoperative adult surgical patients (≥18 years), receiving HFNC or COT applied immediately after extubation that reported reintubation, escalation of respiratory support, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and mortality were eligible for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The following data were extracted from the included studies: first author's name, year of publication, study population, country of origin, study design, number of patients, patients' baseline characteristics and outcomes. Associations were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 10 studies (1327 patients). HFNC significantly reduced the reintubation rate (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.61, p<0.0001) and rate of escalation of respiratory support (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.73, p=0.002) in postextubation surgical patients compared with COT. There were no differences in the incidence of PPCs (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.08, p=0.21) or mortality (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.29, p=0.14).

CONCLUSION

HFNC is associated with a significantly lower reintubation rate and rate of escalation of respiratory support compared with COT in postextubation adult surgical patients, but there is no difference in the incidence of PPCs or mortality. More well-designed, large randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the subpopulation of patients who are most likely to benefit from HFNC therapy.

摘要

目的

评估高流量鼻导管氧疗(HFNC)与常规氧疗(COT)对拔管后成年外科患者再插管率、呼吸支持升级率和临床结局的影响。

设计

已发表文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施和万方数据库,检索时间截至 2018 年 8 月。

入选标准

接受 HFNC 或 COT 治疗的成年外科手术后患者(≥18 岁),接受拔管后立即应用的研究,报告再插管、呼吸支持升级、术后肺部并发症(PPCs)和死亡率的研究符合纳入标准。

数据提取和综合

从纳入的研究中提取以下数据:第一作者姓名、发表年份、研究人群、来源国家、研究设计、患者人数、患者基线特征和结局。采用风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)评估相关性。

结果

这项荟萃分析纳入了 10 项研究(1327 例患者)。与 COT 相比,HFNC 可显著降低拔管后外科患者的再插管率(RR 0.38,95%CI 0.23 至 0.61,p<0.0001)和呼吸支持升级率(RR 0.43,95%CI 0.26 至 0.73,p=0.002)。两组患者术后肺部并发症发生率(RR 0.87,95%CI 0.70 至 1.08,p=0.21)或死亡率(RR 0.45,95%CI 0.16 至 1.29,p=0.14)均无差异。

结论

与 COT 相比,HFNC 可显著降低拔管后成年外科患者的再插管率和呼吸支持升级率,但术后肺部并发症发生率或死亡率无差异。需要更多设计良好的大型随机对照试验来确定最有可能从 HFNC 治疗中获益的患者亚群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38be/6687012/75f0ac112a4e/bmjopen-2018-027523f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验