Suppr超能文献

翻修全膝关节置换术后后稳定型与约束型髁间关节假体的优越存活率:短期随访的回顾性对比分析。

Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

UIC College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3012-3017.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision to use a posterior stabilized (PS) or constrained condylar knee (CCK) articulation in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) has traditionally been based on surgeon preference and knee stability. The purpose of this study is to compare various outcomes and survivorship in RTKA with PS or CCK articulations.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of RTKA with CCK or PS articulations (PS = 106/CCK = 147) was performed with minimum 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were patients with rotating hinged implants or non-CCK/PS constructs. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to determine whether implant articulation influenced (1) complications, (2) aseptic loosening, and (3) re-revision. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative implant survival were constructed with revision as the failure variable.

RESULTS

PS articulation was an independent predictor of increased postoperative knee flexion (6.4°, P = .010) and the knee society functional score (10.0, P = .002). Survivorship was significantly reduced for CCK revision articulations when all-cause re-revision was the primary endpoint (P = .0003, log-rank test of equality). The primary reason for re-revision in the CCK cohort was a recurrent/persistent infection of the operative knee (N = 16, 37.2%), followed by aseptic loosening (N = 13, 30.2%). PS articulations conferred a lower likelihood of re-revision (odds ratio [OR] 0.3, P = .001), but articulation design was not associated with complications (OR 0.5, P = .123) or aseptic loosening (OR 2.6, P = .143).

CONCLUSION

The PS articulation when used for appropriate indication conferred superior survivorship for the primary endpoint of all-cause re-revision and overall knee function when compared to the CCK articulation after RTKA. Implant articulation was not a predictor of aseptic loosening or complications.

摘要

背景

在翻修全膝关节置换术(RTKA)中,使用后稳定型(PS)或限制型髁膝关节(CCK)关节的决定传统上基于外科医生的偏好和膝关节稳定性。本研究的目的是比较 PS 或 CCK 关节 RTKA 的各种结果和存活率。

方法

对 PS(=106/CCK=147)的 RTKA 进行了回顾性比较研究,随访时间至少为 2 年。排除标准为使用旋转铰链植入物或非 CCK/PS 结构的患者。构建多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定植入物关节是否影响(1)并发症,(2)无菌性松动和(3)再翻修。使用翻修为失效变量构建 PS 植入物累积存活率的 Kaplan-Meier 估计。

结果

PS 关节是术后膝关节屈曲增加(6.4°,P=0.010)和膝关节学会功能评分(10.0,P=0.002)的独立预测因子。当所有原因的再翻修为主要终点时,CCK 翻修关节的存活率显著降低(P=0.0003,Log-rank 检验)。CCK 队列中再翻修的主要原因是手术膝关节的复发性/持续性感染(N=16,37.2%),其次是无菌性松动(N=13,30.2%)。PS 关节的再翻修可能性较低(优势比[OR]0.3,P=0.001),但关节设计与并发症(OR0.5,P=0.123)或无菌性松动(OR2.6,P=0.143)无关。

结论

与 CCK 关节相比,PS 关节在 RTKA 后用于适当适应证时,在所有原因再翻修的主要终点和整体膝关节功能方面提供了更好的存活率。植入物关节不是无菌性松动或并发症的预测因子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验