Gerard A, Pector J C, Bleiberg H
Department of Surgery, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1988 Aug;15(8 Pt 2):2351-4.
If liver metastases are diffuse and spread out in the two lobes of the liver, the question remains as to which treatment should be given. Experimental studies showed that when a tumor grows, its vascular pattern becomes mainly arterial. However, if the tumor is still increasing, its center becomes progressively necrotic. After hepatic artery ligation the blood flow of the liver metastases decreases by 90% in the tumor but depriving the arterial circulation of the tumor is not sufficient to achieve a complete cure since the portal blood supply always saves a rim of neoplastic cells around the necrotic area. On the other hand, local infusion of chemotherapy for liver metastases by the arterial route showed a response rate varying between 34 and 70% and the median survival varying between 8 and 17 months. When FUdR chemotherapy was administered using a totally implantable drug infusion pump no improvement in the survival was observed and moreover a high level of toxicity was described including hepatitis and biliary sclerosis. A combined therapy seems a rational approach to treat tumor cells in surviving to the arterial ligation by perfusing the liver with cytotoxic drugs via the portal vein. Taylor's study was very promising but a randomized phase III clinical trial led by the gastrointestinal cancer group of the EORTC with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic artery ligation and portal infusion of 5-FU did not show any difference in the survival of the treated patients when compared with patients treated by hepatic artery ligation alone. 77 patients were registered. Data are now available for 55 patients, respectively 30 and 25 patients in the treated group and in the control group. In both groups the median time to progression was 6 months and the median survival time was 12 months. 20% of the patients treated by hepatic artery ligation and portal chemotherapy had a response, one of them with a complete response, 5 with partial response and 14 patients without significant change in the size of their metastases. On the contrary, in the group treated by hepatic artery ligation alone, only one patient had a partial response with 13 patients having no change in the size of their metastases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
如果肝转移灶呈弥漫性且散布于肝脏两叶,那么应给予何种治疗仍存在疑问。实验研究表明,肿瘤生长时,其血管模式主要变为动脉性。然而,如果肿瘤仍在增大,其中心会逐渐坏死。肝动脉结扎后,肝转移灶的血流量在肿瘤内减少90%,但剥夺肿瘤的动脉循环不足以实现完全治愈,因为门静脉供血总能在坏死区域周围挽救一圈肿瘤细胞。另一方面,经动脉途径对肝转移灶进行局部化疗,有效率在34%至70%之间,中位生存期在8至17个月之间。当使用完全植入式药物输注泵给予氟尿苷化疗时,未观察到生存期的改善,而且还描述了包括肝炎和胆汁硬化在内的高毒性。联合治疗似乎是一种合理的方法,通过门静脉灌注细胞毒性药物来治疗在动脉结扎后存活的肿瘤细胞。泰勒的研究很有前景,但由欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)胃肠道癌症小组牵头的一项随机III期临床试验,旨在评估肝动脉结扎和门静脉输注5-氟尿嘧啶的有效性,与仅接受肝动脉结扎治疗的患者相比,在接受治疗患者的生存期方面未显示出任何差异。登记了77例患者。现在有55例患者的数据,治疗组和对照组分别为30例和25例。两组的疾病进展中位时间均为6个月,中位生存期均为12个月。接受肝动脉结扎和门静脉化疗的患者中有20%有反应,其中1例完全缓解,5例部分缓解,14例转移灶大小无明显变化。相反,在仅接受肝动脉结扎治疗的组中,只有1例患者部分缓解,13例患者转移灶大小无变化。(摘要截断于400字)