Suppr超能文献

验证中文版下颌功能障碍量表与颞下颌关节紊乱症诊断亚组的相关性。

Validation of a Chinese version of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale in relation to the diagnostic subgroup of temporomandibular disorders.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fengcheng Hospital of Fengxian District of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Jan;47(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/joor.12868. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oro-facial function is usually impaired by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Several studies on TMDs have used the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) to assess mandibular dysfunction. However, it was originally created in English and hence needs to be validated for use among Chinese people.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a Chinese version of the JFLS for Chinese TMD patients and to investigate the validity and reliability of the scale.

METHODS

Content validity and temporal stability were evaluated at two different occasions. The reliability and validity of the JFLS were tested in 483 TMD patients. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and split-half reliability were used to assess internal consistency, while the validity was evaluated by factor analysis.

RESULTS

Three factors were extracted during exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 62.39% of the variance. The three-factor model was then measured using confirmatory factor analysis (χ /df = 3.6, root mean square error of approximation = 0.091, comparative fit index = 0.896). Internal (coefficient alpha values of .906 for all items and Guttman split-half reliability of 0.756) and test-retest (intra-class correlation coefficient = .851-.897, 95% confidence interval = 0.656-0.950) reliabilities were excellent.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the JFLS is reliable and valid for use in Chinese TMD patients.

摘要

背景

颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)通常会损害口面功能。一些 TMD 研究使用下颌功能限制量表(JFLS)来评估下颌功能障碍。然而,该量表最初是用英文创建的,因此需要在中国人中进行验证。

目的

为中国 TMD 患者开发 JFLS 的中文版本,并研究该量表的有效性和可靠性。

方法

在两个不同的时间点评估内容有效性和时间稳定性。在 483 名 TMD 患者中测试了 JFLS 的可靠性和有效性。Cronbach's alpha 系数和分半信度用于评估内部一致性,而有效性则通过因子分析进行评估。

结果

探索性因子分析提取了三个因子,占方差的 62.39%。然后使用验证性因子分析对三因子模型进行了测量(χ /df = 3.6,近似均方根误差 = 0.091,比较拟合指数 = 0.896)。内部(所有项目的系数 alpha 值为.906,Guttman 分半信度为 0.756)和重测信度(组内相关系数 =.851-.897,95%置信区间 = 0.656-0.950)均为优秀。

结论

JFLS 的中文版本对于中国 TMD 患者来说是可靠和有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验