Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Health Systems, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):432-442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31238-3.
New Zealand was one of the first countries to establish a universal, tax-funded national health service. Unique features include innovative Māori services, the no-fault accident compensation scheme, and the Pharmaceutical Management Agency, which negotiates with pharmaceutical companies to get the best value for medicines purchased by public money. The so-called universal orientation of the health system, along with a strong commitment to social service provision, have contributed to New Zealand's favourable health statistics. However, despite a long-standing commitment to reducing health inequities, problems with access to care persist and the system is not delivering the promise of equitable health outcomes for all population groups. Primary health services and hospital-based services have developed largely independently, and major restructuring during the 1990s did not produce the expected efficiency gains. A focus on individual-level secondary services and performance targets has been prioritised over tackling issues such as suicide, obesity, and poverty-related diseases through community-based health promotion, preventive activities, and primary care. Future changes need to focus on strengthening the culture and capacity of the system to improve equity of outcomes, including expanding Māori health service provision, integrating existing services and structures with new ones, aligning resources with need to achieve pro-equity outcomes, and strengthening population-based approaches to tackling contemporary drivers of health status.
新西兰是最早建立全民医保体系的国家之一,其医保体系由税收提供资金支持。该体系具有创新性的毛利人服务、无过错事故赔偿计划以及药品管理局等独特特征。药品管理局与制药公司谈判,以用公共资金购买到性价比最高的药品。该体系所谓的全民医保方向以及对社会服务提供的坚定承诺,促成了新西兰有利的健康统计数据。然而,尽管新西兰长期致力于减少卫生不公平现象,但在获得医疗服务方面仍存在问题,且该体系并未兑现为所有人群提供公平健康结果的承诺。初级卫生服务和医院为基础的服务在很大程度上是独立发展的,20 世纪 90 年代的重大重组并未产生预期的效率提升。关注个人层面的二级服务和绩效目标已成为优先事项,而通过社区为基础的健康促进、预防活动和初级保健来解决自杀、肥胖和与贫困相关的疾病等问题则被忽视。未来的变革需要关注加强系统的文化和能力,以提高结果的公平性,包括扩大毛利人健康服务的提供、整合现有服务和结构与新的服务和结构、使资源与实现公平结果的需求保持一致,并加强针对当代健康状况驱动因素的基于人群的方法。