• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一家三级医院实验室危急值结果通报协议及其在临床决策中的应用。

Assessment of a laboratory critical risk result notification protocol in a tertiary care hospital and their use in clinical decision making.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de las Islas Baleares, Spain.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Oct 15;29(3):030703. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.030703. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

DOI:10.11613/BM.2019.030703
PMID:31379461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6610674/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Communication of laboratory critical risk results is essential for patient safety, as it allows early decision making. Our aims were: 1) to retrospectively evaluate the current protocol for telephone notification of critical risk results in terms of rates, efficiency and recipient satisfaction, 2) to assess their use in clinical decision making and 3) to suggest alternative tools for a better assessment of notification protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The biochemical critical risk result notifications reported during 12 months by routine and STAT laboratories in a tertiary care hospital were reviewed. Total number of reports, time for the notification and main magnitudes with critical risk results were calculated. The use of notifications in clinical decision making was assessed by reviewing medical records. Satisfaction with the notification protocol was assessed through an online questionnaire to requesting physicians and nurses.

RESULTS

Critical result was yielded by 0.1% of total laboratory tests. Median time for notification was 3.2 min (STAT) and 16.9 min (routine). The magnitudes with a greater number of critical results were glucose and potassium for routine analyses, and troponin, sodium for STAT. Most notifications were not reflected in the medical records. Overall mean satisfaction with the protocol was 4.2/5.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained indicate that the current protocol is appropriate. Nevertheless, there are some limitations that hamper the evaluation of the impact on clinical decision making. Alternatives were proposed for a proper and precise evaluation.

摘要

简介

实验室危急值结果的沟通对于患者安全至关重要,因为它可以促进早期决策。我们的目的是:1)回顾性评估当前电话通知危急值结果的协议在报告率、效率和接收者满意度方面的情况,2)评估其在临床决策中的应用,3)提出替代工具以更好地评估通知协议。

材料和方法

回顾了一家三级保健医院常规和 STAT 实验室在 12 个月内报告的生化危急值结果通知。计算了报告总数、通知时间和具有危急值结果的主要指标。通过查阅病历评估了通知在临床决策中的应用。通过向请求医生和护士的在线问卷评估了对通知协议的满意度。

结果

危急值结果占总实验室检测的 0.1%。通知的中位数时间为 3.2 分钟(STAT)和 16.9 分钟(常规)。具有更多危急值结果的指标是常规分析中的葡萄糖和钾,以及 STAT 中的肌钙蛋白和钠。大多数通知并未反映在病历中。总体而言,对该协议的满意度平均为 4.2/5。

结论

所获得的结果表明当前协议是合适的。然而,存在一些限制因素,阻碍了对其对临床决策影响的评估。提出了替代方案以进行适当和精确的评估。

相似文献

1
Assessment of a laboratory critical risk result notification protocol in a tertiary care hospital and their use in clinical decision making.评估一家三级医院实验室危急值结果通报协议及其在临床决策中的应用。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Oct 15;29(3):030703. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.030703. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time?我们是否应该根据患者来源和实验室周转时间来定制危急值程序?
J Clin Pathol. 2013 Apr;66(4):269-72. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201030. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
3
Analysis of laboratory critical values at a referral Spanish tertiary university hospital.转诊西班牙三甲大学医院的实验室危急值分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Feb 15;29(1):010704. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.010704. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
4
Decreasing the Lag Between Result Availability and Decision-Making in the Emergency Department Using Push Notifications.使用推送通知减少急诊科决策时的结果可得性延迟。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):666-671. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42749. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
Notification of critical results: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 121 institutions.危急结果报告:美国病理学家学会对121家机构的Q-Probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Dec;132(12):1862-7. doi: 10.5858/132.12.1862.
6
An audit on the reporting of critical results in a tertiary institute.对一所三级医疗机构危急值报告情况的审计。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Mar;46(Pt 2):162-4. doi: 10.1258/acb.2008.008182.
7
Enhance the effectiveness of clinical laboratory critical values initiative notification by implementing a closed-loop system: A five-year retrospective observational study.通过实施闭环系统提高临床实验室危急值通报的效果:一项五年回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Feb;34(2):e23038. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23038. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
Implementation of total laboratory automation at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: effect on turnaround time and cost efficiency.沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗医院全面实验室自动化的实施:对周转时间和成本效益的影响。
Ann Saudi Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;38(5):352-357. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.352.
9
Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making.实验室危急值:自动通知支持有效的临床决策。
Clin Biochem. 2014 Sep;47(13-14):1163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.05.056. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
Toward Laboratory Notification in Pediatric Emergency Departments.迈向儿科急诊的实验室通报
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:152-156. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240366.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Results Reporting in Portuguese Hospital Laboratories: State-of-the-Art.葡萄牙医院实验室的危急结果报告:最新进展
EJIFCC. 2020 Jun 2;31(2):145-156. eCollection 2020 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of laboratory critical values at a referral Spanish tertiary university hospital.转诊西班牙三甲大学医院的实验室危急值分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Feb 15;29(1):010704. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.010704. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
2
Critical Risk Results - An Update on International Initiatives.重大风险结果——国际倡议的最新情况
EJIFCC. 2016 Feb 9;27(1):66-76. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
What Alert Thresholds Should Be Used to Identify Critical Risk Results: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.应当使用何种警报阈值来识别关键风险结果:对证据的系统回顾。
Clin Chem. 2016 Nov;62(11):1445-1457. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.260638. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Is this a critical, panic, alarm, urgent, or markedly abnormal result?这是一个危急、恐慌、警示、紧急还是明显异常的结果?
Clin Chem. 2014 Dec;60(12):1569-70. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.227645. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
5
Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making.实验室危急值:自动通知支持有效的临床决策。
Clin Biochem. 2014 Sep;47(13-14):1163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.05.056. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Utility of repeat testing of critical values: a Q-probes analysis of 86 clinical laboratories.危急值重复检测的效用:86 个临床实验室的 Q-探针分析。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Jun;138(6):788-93. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0140-CP.
7
Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time?我们是否应该根据患者来源和实验室周转时间来定制危急值程序?
J Clin Pathol. 2013 Apr;66(4):269-72. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201030. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
8
Towards harmonisation of critical laboratory result management - review of the literature and survey of australasian practices.迈向关键实验室结果管理的协调统一——文献综述与澳大利亚实践调查
Clin Biochem Rev. 2012 Nov;33(4):149-60.
9
Alert value reporting: a new strategy for patient safety.警示值报告:一种新的患者安全策略。
Clin Biochem. 2013 Feb;46(3):245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
[Clinical impact of laboratory critical values notification as a tool for patient safety].[实验室危急值报告作为患者安全工具的临床影响]
Med Clin (Barc). 2012 Jul 21;139(5):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.01.026. Epub 2012 Mar 28.