Debulpaep Sara, Corbière Véronique, Levy Jack, Schelstraete Petra, Vanden Driessche Koen, Mascart Françoise, Mouchet Françoise
Pediatric Department, CHU Saint Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Laboratory of Vaccinology and Mucosal Immunity, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Pediatr. 2019 Jul 18;7:291. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00291. eCollection 2019.
Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) has proven to be a useful test to evaluate the immune response to antigens in children over the age of 5 years as an alternative to tuberculin skin testing (TST). Much less is known about its performance in younger children, who are at higher risk for developing tuberculosis (TB) disease after exposure. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of using IGRA in TB screening in this population. Children below the age of 5 years at high risk for TB infection were prospectively enrolled, to compare the performance of TST and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube test (QFT). Children were treated in accordance with the diagnosis made at baseline and followed-up for 12 months. We included a total of 60 children of which 97 blood samples were available for analysis. There was 90.72% agreement between TST and QFT (Kappa test 0.59, moderate agreement). With TST as a reference, the QFT positive predictive value was 0.72 and the negative predictive value 0.93. Discordant results were observed with 6% TST+/QFT- paired tests. When we restricted the comparison of TST and QFT to non-BCG-vaccinated children, the degree of agreement was more substantial (95%, Kappa test 0.75) and the negative predictive value was 0.99. We observed 3% discordant TST-/QFT+ results. All children with active TB disease had concordant positive QFT results, with QFT values above 4.00 IU/ml. In a low TB prevalence country, serial testing of QFT was found to produce a moderate agreement with TST results. False positive QFT results would have been eliminated by using a higher cutoff without misdiagnosing the children with TB disease. Some of the false negative QFT results could be explained by false positive TST results on consecutive testing. For now the most prudent approach would be to consider discordant QFT-/TST+ results as false negative QFT results, taking into account the young age of our population and the potential risk for evolution to active TB disease.
γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA)已被证明是一种有用的检测方法,可用于评估5岁以上儿童对抗原的免疫反应,作为结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)的替代方法。对于其在年幼儿童中的表现了解较少,而年幼儿童在接触后发生结核病(TB)的风险更高。我们旨在评估在该人群中使用IGRA进行结核病筛查的准确性。前瞻性纳入了5岁以下结核病感染高危儿童,以比较TST和全血γ-干扰素释放检测(QFT)的性能。根据基线诊断对儿童进行治疗,并随访12个月。我们共纳入了60名儿童,其中97份血样可供分析。TST和QFT之间的一致性为90.72%(kappa检验0.59,中度一致性)。以TST为参照,QFT的阳性预测值为0.72,阴性预测值为0.93。在6%的TST+/QFT-配对检测中观察到不一致的结果。当我们将TST和QFT的比较仅限于未接种卡介苗的儿童时,一致性程度更高(95%,kappa检验0.75),阴性预测值为0.99。我们观察到3%的TST-/QFT+不一致结果。所有活动性结核病患儿的QFT结果均为一致阳性,QFT值高于4.00 IU/ml。在结核病患病率较低的国家,发现对QFT进行系列检测与TST结果有中度一致性。使用更高的临界值可以消除QFT的假阳性结果,而不会误诊结核病患儿。一些QFT假阴性结果可以通过连续检测时TST假阳性结果来解释。目前,最谨慎的方法是将不一致的QFT-/TST+结果视为QFT假阴性结果,同时考虑到我们研究人群的年幼以及发展为活动性结核病的潜在风险。