• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并非所有公平都是平等的:一项关于员工归因于主管公正动机的研究。

Not all fairness is created equal: A study of employee attributions of supervisor justice motives.

机构信息

Department of Management.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2020 Mar;105(3):274-293. doi: 10.1037/apl0000440. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000440
PMID:31380668
Abstract

A large body of research demonstrates that employee perceptions of fair treatment matter. The overwhelming focus of these investigations has been on how employees react to whether or not they perceive their supervisor behaved in a fair manner. We contend, however, that employees not only question and react to whether they are treated fairly, but also to they believe their supervisor acted fairly in the first place. To do so, we consider how employee attributions of supervisor motives for fair treatment influence the cognitive and affective mechanisms by which fair treatment influences employee reactions to fairness. Drawing from the justice actor model, we focus on both cognitive (establishing fairness, identity maintenance, and effecting compliance) and affective (positive affect) motives underlying supervisors' fair treatment. Relying on theory and research on motive attribution and leader affect, we develop predictions for how employees' perceptions of these motives as a result of short-term exchanges over time influence supervisor-directed citizenship behavior through both cognitive (trust in the supervisor) and affective (positive affect) mechanisms. Our experience sampling study of 613 weekly fair events (from 171 employees) largely supported our predictions, demonstrating that attribution of supervisor motives is a meaningful component of an employee's justice experience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

大量研究表明,员工对公平待遇的看法很重要。这些研究的主要关注点一直是员工对主管是否公平对待的反应。然而,我们认为,员工不仅会质疑和回应他们是否受到公平对待,还会质疑他们认为主管最初是否公平行事。为此,我们考虑了员工对主管公平待遇动机的归因如何影响公平待遇影响员工对公平性反应的认知和情感机制。我们借鉴正义行为者模型,关注主管公平对待背后的认知(建立公平、维护身份和实施合规)和情感(积极情感)动机。依靠动机归因和领导情感的理论和研究,我们根据员工随着时间的推移对这些动机的短期互动感知,通过认知(对主管的信任)和情感(积极情感)机制,对员工感知这些动机如何影响主管指导的公民行为做出预测。我们对 613 个每周公平事件(来自 171 名员工)的经验抽样研究在很大程度上支持了我们的预测,表明主管动机的归因是员工正义体验的一个有意义的组成部分。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Not all fairness is created equal: A study of employee attributions of supervisor justice motives.并非所有公平都是平等的:一项关于员工归因于主管公正动机的研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Mar;105(3):274-293. doi: 10.1037/apl0000440. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.事件公平感认知与员工反应:社会实体公平感认知作为调节变量
J Appl Psychol. 2008 May;93(3):513-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513.
3
The role of fairness perceptions and accountability attributions in predicting reactions to organizational events.公平感认知和责任归因在预测对组织事件的反应中的作用。
J Psychol. 2007 Mar;141(2):203-22. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.141.2.203-223.
4
Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice rule compliance: A three-study investigation.员工尽责性、宜人性和主管公正规则遵守:三项研究的调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Nov;102(11):1564-1589. doi: 10.1037/apl0000248. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
It's not only what you do, but why you do it: How managerial motives influence employees' fairness judgments.不仅要看你做了什么,还要看你为什么这样做:管理动机如何影响员工的公平判断。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Apr;107(4):581-603. doi: 10.1037/apl0000898. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Ethical leadership as a substitute for justice enactment: An information-processing perspective.伦理型领导对实施公正的替代作用:信息加工的视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Sep;104(9):1103-1116. doi: 10.1037/apl0000403. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach.上级感知的互动公平的涓滴效应:有调节的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jul;98(4):678-89. doi: 10.1037/a0032080. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
8
The whiplash effect: The (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision.鞭打效应:归因动机在对辱骂性监督的情绪和行为反应中的(调节)作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 May;106(5):754-773. doi: 10.1037/apl0000810. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Reducing job insecurity and increasing performance ratings: does impression management matter?降低工作不安全感和提高绩效评级:印象管理是否重要?
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):852-62. doi: 10.1037/a0033151. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
10
Seeing from a short-term perspective: When and why daily abusive supervisor behavior yields functional and dysfunctional consequences.从短期来看:为何以及何时主管的日常辱骂行为会产生功能和非功能后果。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Mar;106(3):377-398. doi: 10.1037/apl0000508. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Of Headlamps and Marbles: A Motivated Perceptual Approach to the Dynamic and Dialectic Nature of Fairness.论前照灯与弹珠:一种关于公平动态与辩证本质的动机性感知方法。
Organ Psychol Rev. 2025 May;15(2):127-155. doi: 10.1177/20413866231199068. Epub 2023 Sep 6.