• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗慢性肾脏病伴无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的比较效果分析。

Comparative effectiveness analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease and unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2020 May 20;16(1):27-35. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01206.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01206
PMID:31380780
Abstract

AIMS

Outcomes according to the status of renal insufficiency have not been fully evaluated in left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). In the present study therefore, we sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with significant LMCAD stratified by the degree of renal insufficiency and the relative clinical outcomes after PCI and CABG stratified by the differential levels of renal function using data from the large multinational "all-comers" Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization (IRIS-MAIN) registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 4,894 patients with LMCAD, renal insufficiency was graded according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any revascularisation. The patients were stratified into three groups according to eGFR: 3,824 (78%) in group 1 (eGFR ≥60 ml·min-1·1.73 m2), 838 (17%) in group 2 (eGFR ≥30 and <60), and 232 (5%) in group 3 (eGFR <30). At two years, after adjustment, compared with group 1, the risk of MACCE was significantly higher in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.79) and in group 3 (HR 3.39, 95% CI: 2.61-4.40). The p interaction for MACCE across groups was 0.20. The adjusted risk of MACCE was similar between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in groups 1 and 2. However, PCI was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACCE compared to CABG (HR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.08-3.25) in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of renal insufficiency was proportionately associated with unfavourable outcomes in patients with LMCAD. In group 3, PCI was associated with a higher risk of MACCE compared with CABG. Also, the effect of PCI versus CABG on MACCE was consistent, with PCI being associated with less bleeding and CABG being associated with less repeat revascularisation.

摘要

目的

在左主干冠状动脉疾病(LMCAD)中,肾功能不全的预后尚未得到充分评估。因此,本研究旨在利用大型多国“所有患者”介入研究协会-左主干血运重建(IRIS-MAIN)注册登记处的数据,根据肾功能不全程度评估有显著 LMCAD 患者的临床预后,并根据肾功能的不同水平评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的相对临床预后。

方法和结果

在 4894 例 LMCAD 患者中,根据估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)对肾功能不全进行分级。主要终点为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),定义为死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和任何血运重建。根据 eGFR 将患者分为三组:eGFR≥60ml·min-1·1.73m2 组 3824 例(78%),eGFR≥30 且<60 组 838 例(17%),eGFR<30 组 232 例(5%)。两年后,经调整后,与 eGFR≥60ml·min-1·1.73m2 组相比,eGFR≥30 且<60 组(HR 1.46,95%CI:1.18-1.79)和 eGFR<30 组(HR 3.39,95%CI:2.61-4.40)的 MACCE 风险显著更高。MACCE 组间的 p 交互作用为 0.20。在 eGFR≥30 且<60 组和 eGFR<30 组中,PCI 与 CABG 的 MACCE 调整风险相似。然而,与 CABG 相比,eGFR<30 组中 PCI 与 MACCE 风险显著更高(HR 1.88,95%CI:1.08-3.25)。

结论

肾功能不全程度与 LMCAD 患者的不良预后呈比例相关。在 eGFR<30 组中,与 CABG 相比,PCI 与 MACCE 风险更高。此外,PCI 与 CABG 对 MACCE 的影响一致,PCI 与出血减少相关,CABG 与再次血运重建减少相关。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease and unprotected left main coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗慢性肾脏病伴无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的比较效果分析。
EuroIntervention. 2020 May 20;16(1):27-35. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01206.
2
Left Main Revascularization With PCI or CABG in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: EXCEL Trial.左主干血运重建经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗慢性肾脏病患者: EXCEL 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 14;72(7):754-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.057.
3
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
4
Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病合并慢性肾脏病患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
5
Long-term outcomes and comparison after conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for left main disease between patients classified as percutaneous coronary intervention recommendation classes II and III.对于被归类为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗推荐等级为II级和III级的患者,在接受传统冠状动脉搭桥术治疗左主干病变后的长期预后及比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):431-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt429. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
6
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
7
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Three-year clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease patients complicated with chronic kidney disease treated by coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous coronary intervention.未经保护的左主干冠状动脉疾病合并慢性肾脏病患者经冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 3 年临床结果。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;190(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02257-9. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
9
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease with Chronic Kidney Disease.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性肾脏病合并左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较
Int Heart J. 2018 Mar 30;59(2):279-285. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-260. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.药物洗脱支架治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。DELTA 注册研究:一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul;5(7):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus percutaneous coronary revascularization.慢性肾脏病患者的心肌血运重建:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉血运重建的系统评价和荟萃分析
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 5;40(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf021.
2
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stents for De Novo Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease: The SPARTAN-LMS Study.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗初发无保护左主干疾病:SPARTAN-LMS研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 16;10(2):84. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020084.
3
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease-Current Management and Future Perspectives.
左主干冠状动脉疾病——当前的管理与未来展望
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 28;11(19):5745. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195745.