Department of Pediatric Neurology, Jiangxi Children's Hospital, 122 Yangming Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, PR China.
Department of Pediatric Neurology, Jiangxi Children's Hospital, 122 Yangming Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, PR China.
Seizure. 2019 Oct;71:174-178. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
To compare the clinical efficacy of high-dose prednisone monotherapy and the combination of hormone and moderate-dose topiramate (TPM) therapy in children with infantile spasms (IS) and late-onset epileptic spasms (ES), and to evaluate whether the addition of TPM would provide more benefits for patients.
All patients were assigned to receive either high-dose prednisone alone (the maximum doses was 60 mg a day) or high-dose prednisone with TPM (the moderate doses was 5 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was the proportion of children who achieved cessation of spasms at day-49 or day-56 after initial treatment (the minimum duration of treatment were 49 days).
77 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The control rate of spasms on day-14 in hormone monotherapy was similar to combination therapy (71.8% vs 76.3%, p = 0.796). The cessation of spasms rate of patients on day-49 or day-56 was also similar between the two groups (71.8% vs 65.8%, p = 0.569). After 4 months, the cessation of spasms rate of patients in the group of hormone monotherapy was higher than the group of combination therapy, but there was no significant difference (61.5% vs 50.0%, p = 0.308).
The efficacy of the combination therapy was not better than that of the monotherapy in achieving spasm freedom at 14-days, 49-days or 56-days and day-120 in the patients. Adding-on moderate-dose TPM did not help more children achieve spasm freedom and provided no benefit for prevention of IS and late-onset ES in short term. Higher-dose regimens of TPM might be more effective.
比较大剂量泼尼松单药治疗与激素联合中等剂量托吡酯(TPM)治疗婴儿痉挛症(IS)和晚发性癫痫性痉挛(ES)患儿的临床疗效,评估加用 TPM 是否能为患者带来更多获益。
所有患者均接受大剂量泼尼松单药治疗(最大剂量 60mg/天)或大剂量泼尼松联合 TPM 治疗(中等剂量 5mg/kg/天)。主要结局为初始治疗后第 49 天或第 56 天痉挛停止的患儿比例(最短疗程为 49 天)。
77 例患儿随机分为两组。激素单药治疗第 14 天痉挛控制率与联合治疗相似(71.8%比 76.3%,p=0.796)。第 49 天或第 56 天痉挛停止的患儿比例两组间亦相似(71.8%比 65.8%,p=0.569)。4 个月后,激素单药组痉挛停止率高于联合治疗组,但差异无统计学意义(61.5%比 50.0%,p=0.308)。
在第 14 天、第 49 天、第 56 天及第 120 天,联合治疗在实现无痉挛发作方面的疗效并不优于单药治疗。加用中等剂量 TPM 并不能帮助更多患儿实现无痉挛发作,且在短期内对预防 IS 和晚发性 ES 无获益。更高剂量的 TPM 方案可能更有效。