• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院报告卡消费者的特征和决策:基于现场的横断面研究的经验教训。

Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Lange Gasse 20, 90403 Nuremberg, Germany.

Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Expo Plaza 12, 30539 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1061-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.013
PMID:31383371
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals report cards (HRCs) have had little impact on the hospital choice of patients. Thus, health policy makers should learn more about HRC consumers to better understand how to present and target hospital-related quality information.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to learn more about consumers of HRCs and determine the impact of the complexity and tailoring of HRCs on the hospital choice.

METHODS

We used primary data drawn from an onsite-based survey, conducted in 2017 at Germany's premier portal, Weisse Liste (N = 635). We performed hierarchical multivariate logistic regression models to identify main predictors associated with hospital choices.

RESULTS

HRC consumers differ from the national online population and the national population in general. Eighty percent of those patients or family members, who have used a HRC before, confirmed an impact on the hospital choice. The quality of hospital choices decreased with an increasing level of complexity (p < .001); the latter was identified as a significant predictor for making good choices. However, tailoring HRCs did not have an impact on the quality of the hospital choice (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

HRCs have a significant impact on the hospital choice among report card consumers. Health policy makers might focus on decreasing the level of complexity; this, more than tailoring report cards, may help consumers make good hospital choices.

摘要

背景

医院报告卡 (HRCs) 对患者的医院选择影响不大。因此,卫生政策制定者应该更多地了解 HRC 的消费者,以更好地了解如何呈现和针对与医院相关的质量信息。

目的

我们试图更多地了解 HRC 的消费者,并确定 HRC 的复杂性和针对性对医院选择的影响。

方法

我们使用了 2017 年在德国首屈一指的门户 Weisse Liste 上进行的基于现场的调查中的原始数据(N=635)。我们进行了分层多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定与医院选择相关的主要预测因素。

结果

HRC 的消费者与全国在线人口和一般人口不同。80%的曾经使用过 HRC 的患者或其家属确认 HRC 对医院选择有影响。随着复杂性水平的提高(p<0.001),医院选择的质量下降;后者被确定为做出良好选择的重要预测因素。然而,HRC 的针对性并没有对医院选择的质量产生影响(p>.05)。

结论

HRC 对报告卡消费者的医院选择有重大影响。卫生政策制定者可能会专注于降低复杂性水平;这比定制报告卡更能帮助消费者做出正确的医院选择。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study.医院报告卡消费者的特征和决策:基于现场的横断面研究的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1061-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
2
Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?美国的医院质量报告:成绩单设计及纳入患者叙述性评论会影响医院选择吗?
Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun;52(3):933-958. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12519. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Do German hospital report cards have the potential to improve the quality of care?德国医院报告卡有提高医疗质量的潜力吗?
Health Policy. 2014 Dec;118(3):386-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
4
Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.医院报告卡的信息呈现特征与可理解性:用户的设计分析与在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 16;17(3):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3414.
5
Health care public reporting utilization - user clusters, web trails, and usage barriers on Germany's public reporting portal Weisse-Liste.de.德国公共报告门户网站Weisse-Liste.de上的医疗保健公共报告使用情况——用户群体、网络痕迹及使用障碍
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0440-6.
6
What factors determine the intention to use hospital report cards? The perspectives of users and non-users.哪些因素决定了使用医院报告卡的意愿?用户和非用户的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1394-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
7
[Public online reporting of urological content for hospital choice making in Germany: a systematic overview].[德国用于医院选择决策的泌尿外科内容的公共在线报告:系统综述]
Aktuelle Urol. 2019 Aug;50(4):398-406. doi: 10.1055/a-0879-8049. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Public reporting of hospital quality shows inconsistent ranking results.医院质量的公开报告显示排名结果不一致。
Health Policy. 2017 Jan;121(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
The use intention of hospital report cards among patients in the presence or absence of patient-reported outcomes.在有或没有患者报告结局的情况下,患者对医院报告卡的使用意愿。
Health Policy. 2022 Jun;126(6):541-548. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices.如何让医生、医生团体和医院的评分卡对消费者的选择产生更大的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):602-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1197.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenging selective contracting: reforms for enhancing patient empowerment in healthcare.挑战选择性合同:增强医疗保健中患者赋权的改革措施。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 6;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00673-9.
2
The elicitation of patient preferences for hip replacement surgery: a discrete choice experiment.髋关节置换手术患者偏好的诱导:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12393-6.
3
A composite measure for patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care: design principles and validity checks.
骨科护理中患者报告结局的综合衡量指标:设计原则与有效性检验。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):2341-2351. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03395-0. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
4
Hospital rating websites play a minor role for uro-oncologic patients when choosing a hospital for major surgery: results of the German multicenter NAVIGATOR-study.医院评级网站在泌尿外科患者选择大型手术医院时作用较小:德国多中心 NAVIGATOR 研究结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):601-609. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04271-1. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
Factors Associated with the Patient/Client Use of Report Cards, Physician Rating Websites, Social Media, and Google for Hospital and Physician Selection: A Nationwide Survey.与患者/客户使用报告卡、医生评级网站、社交媒体和谷歌进行医院和医生选择相关的因素:一项全国性调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 1;10(10):1931. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101931.
6
[Effects of statutory quality assurance in acute inpatient care].[法定质量保证在急性住院治疗中的作用]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Mar;65(3):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03489-z. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Can competition improve hospital quality of care? A difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the effect of increasing quality transparency on hospital quality.竞争能否提高医院的护理质量?一种评估提高质量透明度对医院质量影响的双重差分方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Sep;23(7):1229-1242. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01423-9. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Testing the effects on information use by older versus younger women of modality and narration style in a hospital report card.测试医院报告卡中呈现方式和叙述风格对老年女性和年轻女性信息使用的影响。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):567-578. doi: 10.1111/hex.13389. Epub 2021 Dec 24.