• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲控制霍乱的广泛措施:水、环境卫生和洗手。

Broad approaches to cholera control in Asia: Water, sanitation and handwashing.

机构信息

Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.

Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2020 Feb 29;38 Suppl 1:A110-A117. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.084. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.084
PMID:31383486
Abstract

Cholera has been eliminated as a public health problem in high-income countries that have implemented sanitation system separating the community's fecal waste from their drinking water and food supply. These expensive, highly-engineered systems, first developed in London over 150 years ago, have not reached low-income high-risk communities across Asia. Barriers to their implementation in communities at highest risk for cholera include the high capital and operating costs for this technological approach, limited capacity and perverse incentives of local governments, and a decreasing availability of water. Interim solutions including household level water treatment, constructing latrines and handwashing promotion have only marginally reduced the risk of cholera and other fecally transmitted diseases. Increased research to develop and policy flexibility to implement a new generation of solutions that are designed specifically to address the physical, financial and political constraints of low-income communities offers the best prospect for reducing the burden of cholera across Asia.

摘要

在高收入国家,通过建立卫生系统将社区的粪便废物与饮用水和食物供应隔离开来,霍乱已被消除,不再成为公共卫生问题。这些昂贵的、高度工程化的系统早在 150 多年前就在伦敦首次开发,但尚未在亚洲的低收入高风险社区得到普及。在霍乱风险最高的社区实施这些系统存在障碍,包括这种技术方法的高资本和运营成本、地方政府能力有限和激励机制不当,以及水资源日益减少。包括家庭层面水处理、建造厕所和推广洗手在内的临时解决方案,仅略微降低了霍乱和其他粪便传播疾病的风险。增加研究以开发专门针对低收入社区的物理、财务和政治限制的新一代解决方案,并制定实施政策的灵活性,为减少亚洲地区霍乱负担提供了最佳前景。

相似文献

1
Broad approaches to cholera control in Asia: Water, sanitation and handwashing.亚洲控制霍乱的广泛措施:水、环境卫生和洗手。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 29;38 Suppl 1:A110-A117. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.084. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
2
Formative Research for the Development of Evidence-Based Targeted Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions to Reduce Cholera in Hotspots in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Preventative Intervention for Cholera for 7 Days (PICHA7) Program.开发基于证据的有针对性的水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施以减少刚果民主共和国热点地区霍乱的形成性研究:霍乱 7 天预防干预(PICHA7)项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912243.
3
Estimating effects of improved drinking water and sanitation on cholera.估算改善饮用水和卫生条件对霍乱的影响。
J Water Health. 2013 Dec;11(4):671-83. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.238.
4
Formative research for the design of a scalable water, sanitation, and hygiene mobile health program: CHoBI7 mobile health program.形成性研究设计可扩展的水、环境卫生和个人卫生移动卫生方案:CHoBI7 移动卫生方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7144-z.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Measure Spillover Effects of a Combined Water, Sanitation, and Handwashing Intervention in Rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村地区开展的一项关于水、环境卫生和个人卫生综合干预措施溢出效应的随机对照试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;187(8):1733-1744. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy046.
6
Cholera - management and prevention.霍乱的管理与预防。
J Infect. 2017 Jun;74 Suppl 1:S66-S73. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30194-9.
7
Evaluation of Knowledge and Practices Regarding Cholera, Water Treatment, Hygiene, and Sanitation Before and After an Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaign-Haiti, 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年海地口服霍乱疫苗接种运动前后关于霍乱、水处理、卫生与环境卫生的知识及实践评估
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Dec 7;95(6):1305-1313. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0555. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
Mozambique's response to cyclone Idai: how collaboration and surveillance with water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions were used to control a cholera epidemic.莫桑比克应对伊代气旋的措施:如何通过与水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施的合作和监测来控制霍乱疫情。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Jun 16;9(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00692-5.
9
The Impact of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions to Control Cholera: A Systematic Review.水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施对控制霍乱的影响:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0135676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135676. eCollection 2015.
10
Sustained Uptake of a Hospital-Based Handwashing with Soap and Water Treatment Intervention (Cholera-Hospital-Based Intervention for 7 Days [CHoBI7]): A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于医院的肥皂和水处理洗手干预措施(霍乱医院7天干预措施[CHoBI7])的持续采用:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Feb;94(2):428-36. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0502. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatio-temporal pattern and risk factors associated with cholera outbreaks in selected high-risk areas of Kenya.肯尼亚部分高风险地区霍乱暴发的时空模式及相关风险因素
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2025 Jul 1;119(7):758-766. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traf032.
2
Impact of a multi-pronged cholera intervention in an endemic setting.多管齐下的霍乱干预措施在地方病流行地区的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Feb 19;19(2):e0012867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012867. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Impact of a multi-pronged cholera intervention in an endemic setting.
多管齐下的霍乱干预措施在地方病流行地区的影响。
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 9:2023.12.14.23299970. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.14.23299970.
4
The interplay between WASH practices and vaccination with oral cholera vaccines in protecting against cholera in urban Bangladesh: Reanalysis of a cluster-randomized trial.WASH 措施与口服霍乱疫苗接种在孟加拉国城市预防霍乱中的相互作用:一项集群随机试验的再分析。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 31;41(14):2368-2375. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.054. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
Mask-Wearing and Handwashing Behaviors of Chinese Rural Residents during the Pandemic of COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Survey.《COVID-19 大流行期间中国农村居民的戴口罩和洗手行为:一项横断面调查》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;20(1):779. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010779.
6
Are better existing WASH practices in urban slums associated with a lower long-term risk of severe cholera? A prospective cohort study with 4 years of follow-up in Mirpur, Bangladesh.在孟加拉国米尔布尔,进行了一项为期 4 年的前瞻性队列研究,结果显示,城市贫民窟中更好的现有 WASH 实践是否与较低的长期严重霍乱风险相关?
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e060858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060858.
7
Diagnosis, Management, and Future Control of Cholera.霍乱的诊断、管理和未来控制。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022 Sep 21;35(3):e0021121. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00211-21. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
8
How does handwashing behaviour change in response to a cholera outbreak? A qualitative case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.在霍乱疫情爆发时,人们的洗手行为会如何变化?刚果民主共和国的一项定性案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 12;17(4):e0266849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266849. eCollection 2022.
9
A genomic snapshot of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in Colombia.哥伦比亚伤寒沙门氏菌血清型的基因组快照。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 16;15(9):e0009755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009755. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Prevention and control of cholera with household and community water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: A scoping review of current international guidelines.家庭和社区水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施预防和控制霍乱:当前国际指南的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0226549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226549. eCollection 2020.