Lecturer, Department of Removable Prosthodontics and Gerodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Student of Postgraduate Clinical Specialty Track, Department of Removable Prosthodontics and Gerodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Apr;123(4):630-634. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
Changes in the intraoral condition immediately after implant placement and in patients using fixed prosthetic appliances with implant abutments cause problems that require the use of an easily adjustable implant-supported overdenture system.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to develop a simulated implant-supported overdenture attachment system by using healing screws for the patrix and a silicone resilient denture liner for the matrix and to investigate the initial retention force, time-course changes, and allowable range of the angle between attachments.
Tests on the retention force and allowable range of the angle were performed. Attachments using tissue-level healing screws (height: 2.0 and 3.0 mm) for the patrix and a silicone resilient denture liner for the matrix were prepared. In the retention force measurement test, the frequency of insertion and removal was set at 3 per day to simulate a 4-month relief period. The joined attachment model was pulled apart, and the maximum traction (N) required to remove it was defined as the retention force. The retention force was measured every 90 times (representing the number of insertions and removals per month). To test the allowable angle range, 2 patrices were used. The angle between the 2 patrices was set at 0, 10, 20, and 30 degrees, and the angular limit for joining with the matrix was measured. The initial retention force of the healing screw attachments was compared with that of a polymeric O-ring by using 1-way layout ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test (α=.05). To analyze time-course changes in the 2 types of healing screw attachments, the retention force before insertion and removal was compared with that after repeated insertions and removals for each simulated period using 1-way layout ANOVA followed by the Dunnett test (α=.05).
The initial retention force of the 2.0- and 3.0-mm healing screws was 2.4 ±0.1 and 2.6 ±0.2 N. After repeating insertions and removals to simulate use for 4 months, the retention force of the 2.0- and 3.0-mm healing screws was 1.8 ±0.2 and 2.2 ±0.1 N, respectively, both showing significant differences from the initial retention force (P<.05). The allowable angle range test revealed that insertion and removal of the healing screws was possible up to 30 degrees.
Under the conditions of this in vitro study, repeated insertion and removal attenuated the retention force but was still equivalent to the retention force of the O-ring. The allowable range of the angle between patrices for insertion and removal was up to 30 degrees.
种植体植入后即刻以及使用带有种植体基台的固定修复体的患者的口腔内状况发生变化,这导致需要使用易于调节的种植体支持覆盖义齿系统。
本体外研究的目的是通过使用愈合螺丝作为阴模和硅橡胶弹性义齿衬垫作为阳模来开发模拟的种植体支持覆盖义齿附件系统,并研究附件的初始固位力、时程变化和附件之间角度的允许范围。
进行了固位力和角度允许范围的测试。制备了使用组织水平愈合螺丝(高度:2.0 和 3.0 毫米)作为阴模和硅橡胶弹性义齿衬垫作为阳模的附件。在固位力测量测试中,插入和移除的频率设置为每天 3 次,以模拟 4 个月的缓解期。将连接的附件模型拉开,移除它所需的最大牵引力(N)定义为固位力。每隔 90 次测量一次固位力(代表每月插入和移除的次数)。为了测试允许的角度范围,使用了 2 个阴模。将 2 个阴模之间的角度设置为 0、10、20 和 30 度,并测量与阳模连接的角度限制。使用单向布局方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验(α=.05)比较愈合螺丝附件的初始固位力与聚合 O 形圈的固位力。为了分析 2 种愈合螺丝附件的时程变化,使用单向布局方差分析和 Dunnett 检验(α=.05)比较插入和移除前后的初始保留力。
2.0 和 3.0 毫米愈合螺丝的初始固位力分别为 2.4 ±0.1 和 2.6 ±0.2 N。在模拟使用 4 个月的重复插入和移除后,2.0 和 3.0 毫米愈合螺丝的固位力分别为 1.8 ±0.2 和 2.2 ±0.1 N,与初始固位力均有显著差异(P<.05)。角度允许范围测试表明,愈合螺丝的插入和移除可达 30 度。
在本体外研究条件下,重复插入和移除会减弱固位力,但仍相当于 O 形圈的固位力。阴模和阳模之间的角度允许范围为插入和移除可达 30 度。