Tamain Mathilde, Sayegh Johnny, Lionet Arnaud, Grimbert Philippe, Philipponnet Carole, Hazzan Marc, Augusto Jean-François, Büchler Mathias, Merlin Etienne, Kosmadakis George, Tiple Aurélien, Pereira Bruno, Garrouste Cyril, Heng Anne-Elisabeth
Service de Néphrologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Service de Néphrologie, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2019 Aug;58(4):515-524. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Background - Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has shown encouraging results in the prevention of allograft rejection in heart transplantation. However, the role of ECP in kidney transplant (KT) rejection needs to be determined. Methods - This multicentre retrospective study included 33 KT recipients who were treated with ECP for allograft rejection (23 acute antibody-mediated rejections (AMRs), 2 chronic AMRs and 8 acute cellular rejections (ACRs)). The ECP indications were KT rejection in patients who were resistant to standard therapies (n = 18) or in patients for whom standard therapies were contraindicated because of concomitant infections or cancers (n = 15). Results - At 12 months (M12) post-ECP, 11 patients (33%) had a stabilization of kidney function with a graft survival rate of 61%. The Banff AMR score (g + ptc + v) was a risk factor for graft loss at M12 (HR 1.44 [1.01-2.05], p < 0.05). The factorial mixed data analysis identified 2 clusters. Patients with a functional graft at M12 tended to have cellular and/or chronic rejections. Patients with graft loss at M12 tended to have acute rejections and/or AMR; higher serum creatinine levels; DSA levels and histologic scores of AMR; and a longer delay between the rejection and ECP start than those of patients with functional grafts. Conclusions - ECP may be helpful to control ACR or moderate AMR in KT recipients presenting concomitant opportunistic infections or malignancies when it is initiated early.
背景 - 体外光化学疗法(ECP)在预防心脏移植中的同种异体移植排斥反应方面已显示出令人鼓舞的结果。然而,ECP在肾移植(KT)排斥反应中的作用尚待确定。方法 - 这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了33例接受ECP治疗同种异体移植排斥反应的KT受者(23例急性抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)、2例慢性AMR和8例急性细胞排斥反应(ACR))。ECP的适应证为对标准治疗有抵抗的KT排斥反应患者(n = 18)或因合并感染或癌症而标准治疗禁忌的患者(n = 15)。结果 - ECP治疗后12个月(M12),11例患者(33%)肾功能稳定,移植肾存活率为61%。Banff AMR评分(g+ptc+v)是M12时移植肾丢失的危险因素(HR 1.44 [1.01 - 2.05],p < 0.05)。析因混合数据分析确定了2个聚类。M12时移植肾功能良好的患者倾向于发生细胞性和/或慢性排斥反应。M12时移植肾丢失的患者倾向于发生急性排斥反应和/或AMR;血清肌酐水平更高;AMR的DSA水平和组织学评分更高;与移植肾功能良好的患者相比,排斥反应与开始ECP之间的延迟更长。结论 - 对于合并机会性感染或恶性肿瘤的KT受者,早期启动ECP可能有助于控制ACR或中度AMR。