• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心回顾性比较原发性腹腔引流与原发性剖腹术治疗自发性肠穿孔的结果。

Multicenter retrospective comparison of spontaneous intestinal perforation outcomes between primary peritoneal drain and primary laparotomy.

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine/Yale-New haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.

Section of Pediatric Surgery, Saint Louis University/Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1270-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.07.007
PMID:31383579
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institution retrospective review of infants with diagnosis of SIP from 2012 to 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain vs infants treated with laparotomy.

RESULTS

We identified 171 patients treated for SIP (drain n = 110 vs. laparotomy n = 61). There were no differences in maternal or prenatal characteristics. There were no clinically significant differences in vital signs, white blood cell or platelet measures, up to 48 h after intervention. Patients who were treated primarily with a drain were more premature (24.9 vs. 27.2 weeks, p < 0.001) and had lower median birth weight (710 g vs. 896 g, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay (LOS) or mortality between the groups. Primary laparotomy group had more procedures (median number 1 vs. 2, p = 0.002). There were 32 (29%) primary drain failures whereby a laparotomy was ultimately needed.

CONCLUSIONS

SIP treated with primary drain is successful in the majority of patients with no significant differences in outcomes when compared to laparotomy with stoma.

THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较采用单纯腹腔引流与剖腹术治疗自发性肠穿孔(SIP)患儿的结局。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2016 年期间诊断为 SIP 的婴儿进行了多机构回顾性研究。比较了采用单纯腹腔引流与剖腹术治疗的婴儿的临床特征和结局。

结果

我们共纳入 171 例接受 SIP 治疗的患儿(引流组 n=110 例,剖腹术组 n=61 例)。两组患儿的母亲或产前特征无差异。干预后 48 小时内,两组患儿的生命体征、白细胞或血小板指标均无明显差异。采用单纯引流治疗的患儿更早产(24.9 周 vs. 27.2 周,p<0.001),出生体重中位数更低(710g vs. 896g,p<0.001)。两组患儿的并发症、完全经口喂养时间、住院时间(LOS)或死亡率无显著差异。剖腹术组的手术次数更多(中位数 1 次 vs. 2 次,p=0.002)。有 32 例(29%)患儿引流失败,最终需要剖腹术。

结论

对于 SIP,采用单纯引流治疗在大多数患者中是成功的,与造口术相比,其结局无显著差异。

证据等级

III。

相似文献

1
Multicenter retrospective comparison of spontaneous intestinal perforation outcomes between primary peritoneal drain and primary laparotomy.多中心回顾性比较原发性腹腔引流与原发性剖腹术治疗自发性肠穿孔的结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1270-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
2
Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates.极低和超低出生体重儿自发性肠穿孔与坏死性小肠结肠炎的临床预测因素。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Nov;59(11):161608. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.017. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy as initial surgical treatment for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation in preterm low birth weight infants.对于早产低体重儿的坏死性小肠结肠炎穿孔或自发性肠穿孔,腹膜引流与剖腹手术作为初始手术治疗方法的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD006182. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006182.pub2.
4
Definitive peritoneal drainage in the extremely low birth weight infant with spontaneous intestinal perforation: predictors and hospital outcomes.自发性肠穿孔极低出生体重儿确定性腹腔引流:预测因素和住院结局。
J Perinatol. 2015 Aug;35(8):607-11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.23. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Peritoneal drainage or laparotomy for neonatal bowel perforation? A randomized controlled trial.新生儿肠穿孔:采用腹膜引流术还是剖腹手术?一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf81.
6
Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation.剖腹手术与腹腔引流治疗坏死性小肠结肠炎并穿孔的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 25;354(21):2225-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054605.
7
Evaluation of the management of intestinal perforation in very low birth infants, a 10-year review.极低出生体重儿肠穿孔的处理评估:10 年回顾。
Acta Paediatr. 2024 Apr;113(4):733-738. doi: 10.1111/apa.17069. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
To drain or not to drain: a single institution experience with neonatal intestinal perforation.是否进行引流:一家机构关于新生儿肠穿孔的经验
J Perinat Med. 2006;34(4):338-41. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.065.
9
Is There Still a Role for Peritoneal Drains in Neonatal Pneumoperitoneum? A Single-Center Experience.新生儿气腹症中腹膜引流是否仍有作用?单中心经验。
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.093. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
10
Peritoneal drainage as the initial management of intestinal perforation in premature infants.腹膜引流作为早产儿肠穿孔的初始治疗方法。
Am Surg. 2014 Sep;80(9):851-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen and risk of spontaneous intestinal perforations in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非甾体抗炎药和对乙酰氨基酚的使用与早产儿自发性肠穿孔风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2024 Nov 22;12:1450121. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1450121. eCollection 2024.
2
Spontaneous intestinal perforation among very preterm infants in China: a multicenter cohort study.中国极早产儿自发性肠穿孔:一项多中心队列研究
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Apr 30;13(4):542-554. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-584. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Perforated Meckel's Diverticulum and Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction in a Preterm Neonate: A Case Report.
早产儿梅克尔憩室穿孔与粘连性肠梗阻:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):e56208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56208. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Efficacy of peritoneal drainage in very-low-birth-weight neonates with Bell's stage II necrotizing enterocolitis: A single-center retrospective study.腹膜引流术治疗Bell II期坏死性小肠结肠炎极低出生体重儿的疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):1416-1422. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1416.
5
Laparotomy versus Peritoneal Drainage as Primary Treatment for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖腹手术与腹腔引流作为早产儿外科坏死性小肠结肠炎或自发性肠穿孔的主要治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;10(7):1170. doi: 10.3390/children10071170.
6
Single cell analysis mass cytometry of spontaneous intestinal perforation reveals alterations in small intestinal innate and adaptive mucosal immunity.单细胞分析 自发肠穿孔的质谱流式细胞术揭示了小肠固有和适应性黏膜免疫的改变。
Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 7;14:995558. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.995558. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Pre-mature Infants vs. Term-Born Infants With Congenital Heart Disease.早产儿与患有先天性心脏病的足月儿坏死性小肠结肠炎的比较。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 20;9:802607. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.802607. eCollection 2021.
8
Using machine learning analysis to assist in differentiating between necrotizing enterocolitis and spontaneous intestinal perforation: A novel predictive analytic tool.利用机器学习分析辅助鉴别坏死性小肠结肠炎与自发性肠穿孔:一种新型预测分析工具。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Oct;56(10):1703-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 13.