Jacobs Victoria, T May Heidi, L Bair Tami, G Crandall Brian, J Cutler DO Michael, D Day John, Le Viet, Mallender Charles, S Osborn Jeffrey, Weiss J Peter, Bunch T Jared
Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.
Stanford University, Department of Internal Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Apr 30;11(6):2164. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2164. eCollection 2019 Apr.
Long-term outcomes after direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in patients that receive anticoagulation have demonstrated to have no adverse sequela. Less is known about the impact on atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes and resource utilization of repeated DCCVs that are often required for long-term rhythm control.
A total of 4,135 AF patients >18 years of age that underwent DCCV with long-term system follow-up were evaluated. Patients were stratified by the number of DCCVs received: 1 (n=2,201), 2-4 (n=1,748), and ≥5 (n=186). Multivariable Cox hazard regression was used to determine the association of DCCV categories to the outcomes of death, AF hospitalization, AF ablation, DCCVs, and stroke/transient ischemic attack.
The average follow-up of the patient population was 1,633.1±1,232.9 (median: 1,438.0) days. Patients who underwent 2-4 and ≥5 DCCVs had more comorbidities, namely hypertension, hyperlipidemia and heart failure. Anticoagulation use was common at the time of DCCV in all groups (89.1%, 91.2%, 91.9%, p=0.06) and amiodarone use increased with increasing DCCV category (30.1%, 43.4%, 52.2, p<0.0001). At 5 years, patients that received more DCCVs had higher rates of repeat DCCVs, AF hospitalizations, and ablations. Stroke rates were not increased. Though not statistically significant, 5-year death was increased when comparing DCCV >5 vs. 1, (HR=1.32 [0.89-1.94], p=0.17).
This study found that the increasing number of DCCVs, despite escalation of other pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies, is a long-term independent risk factor for repeat DCCVs, ablations, and AF hospitalizations among AF patients.
接受抗凝治疗的患者直流电复律(DCCV)后的长期预后已表明无不良后遗症。对于长期节律控制通常所需的重复DCCV对房颤(AF)预后和资源利用的影响,人们了解较少。
对4135例年龄大于18岁且接受DCCV并进行长期系统随访的房颤患者进行评估。患者按接受DCCV的次数分层:1次(n = 2201)、2 - 4次(n = 1748)和≥5次(n = 186)。采用多变量Cox风险回归分析来确定DCCV类别与死亡、房颤住院、房颤消融、DCCV以及中风/短暂性脑缺血发作等预后之间的关联。
患者群体的平均随访时间为1633.1±1232.9(中位数:1438.0)天。接受2 - 4次和≥5次DCCV的患者有更多的合并症,即高血压、高脂血症和心力衰竭。所有组在DCCV时抗凝治疗的使用都很常见(89.1%、91.2%、91.9%,p = 0.06),并且胺碘酮的使用随着DCCV次数的增加而增加(30.1%、43.4%、52.2%,p < 0.0001)。在5年时,接受更多DCCV的患者重复进行DCCV、房颤住院和消融的发生率更高。中风发生率没有增加。尽管无统计学意义,但比较DCCV次数>5次与1次时,5年死亡率有所增加,(风险比=1.32[0.89 - 1.94],p = 0.17)。
本研究发现,尽管其他药物和非药物治疗有所升级,但DCCV次数的增加是房颤患者重复进行DCCV、消融和房颤住院的长期独立危险因素。