Suppr超能文献

新生儿喂养评估工具 - 混合母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养(NeoEAT - 混合喂养):因素分析和心理测量特性

Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool - Mixed Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding): factor analysis and psychometric properties.

作者信息

Pados Britt Frisk, Thoyre Suzanne M, Galer Kara

机构信息

1Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Maloney 268, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA.

2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.

出版信息

Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019 Jul 31;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s40748-019-0107-7. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification of feeding difficulty in infancy is critical to supporting breastfeeding and ensuring optimal nutrition for brain development. The Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool (NeoEAT) is a parent-report assessment that currently has two versions: NeoEAT - Breastfeeding and NeoEAT - Bottle-feeding for use in breast and bottle-fed infants, respectively. There are currently no valid and reliable parent-report measures to assess feeding through a combination of both breast and bottle delivery. The purpose of this study was to conduct a factor analysis and test the psychometric properties of a new measure, the NeoEAT - Mixed Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding), including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and known-groups validity.

METHODS

Parents of infants younger than 7 months who had fed by both bottle and breast in the previous 7 days were invited to participate. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's α. Test-retest reliability was tested between scores on the NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding completed 2 weeks apart. Construct validity was tested using correlations between the NeoEAT - Mixed-Feeding, the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire - Revised (I-GERQ-R), and the Infant Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire (IGSQ). Known-groups validation was tested between healthy infants and infants with feeding problems.

RESULTS

A total of 608 parents participated. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 68-item scale with 5 sub-scales. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = .88) and test-retest reliability ( = 0.91;  < .001) were both acceptable. Construct validity was demonstrated through correlations with the I-GERQ-R ( = 0.57;  < .001) and IGSQ ( = 0.5;  < .001). Infants with feeding problems scored significantly higher on the NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding, indicating more problematic feeding symptoms, than infants without feeding problems ( < .001), supporting known-groups validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding is a 68-item parent-reported measure of breast- and bottle-feeding behavior for infants less than 7 months old that now has evidence of validity and reliability for use in clinical practice and research. The NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding can be used to identify infants with problematic feeding, guide referral decisions, and evaluate response to interventions.

摘要

背景

早期识别婴儿期的喂养困难对于支持母乳喂养和确保大脑发育的最佳营养至关重要。新生儿喂养评估工具(NeoEAT)是一种由家长报告的评估工具,目前有两个版本:NeoEAT - 母乳喂养版和NeoEAT - 奶瓶喂养版,分别用于母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养的婴儿。目前尚无有效且可靠的由家长报告的措施来评估通过母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养相结合的方式进行的喂养情况。本研究的目的是进行因子分析并测试一种新的测量工具——NeoEAT - 混合母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养(NeoEAT - 混合喂养)的心理测量特性,包括内部一致性信度、重测信度、结构效度和已知群体效度。

方法

邀请在过去7天内同时采用奶瓶喂养和母乳喂养的7个月以下婴儿的家长参与。使用克朗巴哈α系数测试内部一致性信度。在间隔2周完成的NeoEAT - 混合喂养得分之间测试重测信度。使用NeoEAT - 混合喂养、修订版婴儿胃食管反流问卷(I - GERQ - R)和婴儿胃肠道症状问卷(IGSQ)之间的相关性测试结构效度。在健康婴儿和有喂养问题的婴儿之间测试已知群体效度。

结果

共有608名家长参与。探索性因子分析揭示了一个包含68个条目的量表及5个分量表。内部一致性信度(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.88)和重测信度( = 0.91; <.001)均可接受。通过与I - GERQ - R( = 0.57; <.001)和IGSQ( = 0.5; <.001)的相关性证明了结构效度。有喂养问题的婴儿在NeoEAT - 混合喂养上的得分显著高于无喂养问题的婴儿,表明喂养症状问题更多( <.001),支持已知群体效度。

结论

NeoEAT - 混合喂养是一种由家长报告的针对7个月以下婴儿母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养行为的包含68个条目的测量工具,目前有证据表明其在临床实践和研究中具有有效性和可靠性。NeoEAT - 混合喂养可用于识别有喂养问题的婴儿、指导转诊决策以及评估干预反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82e7/6668191/f9785930bac2/40748_2019_107_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验