Song Jung-Yul, Qian Li-Wen, Cheng Ming-Jia, Qian Yu-Fen
Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011. E-mail:
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019;28(2):141-147.
To compare characteristics of temporomandibular joint and related structures according to gender and Angle Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ class.
Cone-beam CT (CBCT) was performed in 123 patients with malocclusion, and three-dimensional reconstruction was performed with Mimics 19.0 software. The anterior, upper, and posterior spaces of temporomandibular joint, width and depth of acetabulum, height and horizontal angle of condyle, radius of condyle, and anteroposterior and long-axis diameter of condyle were analysed on sagittal plane. The position of condyle in the joint fossa was analyzed using Pullinger methods. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.
Significant differences were found in the long axis and radius of the condyles between Class Ⅰ and Ⅲ, Class Ⅰ and Ⅱ, respectively (P<0.05). The widest acetabulum was observed in Class Ⅲ, followed by Class Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅱ. Moreover, the deepest acetabulum was found in Class Ⅱ, followed by Class Ⅱ, Ⅰ, and Ⅲ. No significant differences were detected in the left and right condyle-related structures among different temporomandibular articulation. In addition, the anterior articular space was significantly larger in Class Ⅰ patients, compared with Class Ⅱ patients.
There are significant differences in condylar morphology, joint space, joint fossa morphology and condylar position between different Angle classifications.
根据性别以及安氏Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类错颌畸形比较颞下颌关节及相关结构的特征。
对123例错颌畸形患者进行锥形束CT(CBCT)检查,并用Mimics 19.0软件进行三维重建。在矢状面上分析颞下颌关节的前间隙、上间隙和后间隙、关节窝的宽度和深度、髁突的高度和水平角、髁突半径以及髁突的前后径和长轴直径。采用Pullinger方法分析髁突在关节窝中的位置。使用SPSS 22.0软件包进行统计分析。
Ⅰ类与Ⅲ类、Ⅰ类与Ⅱ类之间髁突的长轴和半径分别存在显著差异(P<0.05)。Ⅲ类患者的关节窝最宽,其次是Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅱ类。此外,Ⅱ类患者的关节窝最深,其次是Ⅱ类、Ⅰ类和Ⅲ类。不同颞下颌关节类型之间左右髁突相关结构未检测到显著差异。此外,与Ⅱ类患者相比,Ⅰ类患者的前关节间隙明显更大。
不同安氏分类之间在髁突形态、关节间隙、关节窝形态和髁突位置方面存在显著差异。