Suppr超能文献

根据 Angle 分类的恒牙列颞下颌关节的锥形束 CT 评估。

Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle's classification.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Stomatology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China.

Department of Stomatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.

出版信息

Oral Radiol. 2020 Jul;36(3):261-266. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00403-3. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare characteristics of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and related structures according to Angle class I, II, II, and III.

METHODS

123 Chinese patients (13-36 years old, 60 males, and 63 females) were classified in four groups according to Angle's classification: skeletal class I (31 patients), skeletal class II division 1 (30 patients), skeletal class II division 2 (30 patients), and skeletal class III (32 patients). Left and right TMJs of each subject were evaluated independently with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The position of condyle in the joint fossa was analyzed according to Pullinger.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between class III subjects and class I, II, II in the superior joint space (p < 0.05). Compared with class II, II, and III subjects, the height and diameter of condyle in class I was significantly larger (p < 0.05). The width of joint fossa was significantly larger in Angle class III than in Angle class I, II, and II, while the depth was significantly smaller. The condyle position in class III subjects was more anteriorly displaced compared with that in class I subjects. In class II patients, the condyle position was mainly concentric and posterior.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in condylar morphology, joint space, joint fossa morphology, and condylar position between different Angle classifications.

摘要

目的

比较颞下颌关节(TMJ)和相关结构的特征,根据 Angle 分类 I、II、II 和 III。

方法

123 名中国患者(13-36 岁,60 名男性,63 名女性)根据 Angle 分类分为四组:骨骼 I 类(31 例)、骨骼 II 类 1 分(30 例)、骨骼 II 类 2 分(30 例)和骨骼 III 类(32 例)。每位受试者的左右 TMJ 均采用锥形束 CT(CBCT)进行独立评估。根据 Pullinger 分析髁突在关节窝中的位置。

结果

III 类患者与 I、II、II 类患者的关节上间隙存在显著差异(p<0.05)。与 II、II 和 III 类患者相比,I 类患者的髁突高度和直径明显更大(p<0.05)。III 类患者的关节窝宽度明显大于 I、II 和 II 类患者,而深度明显较小。与 I 类患者相比,III 类患者的髁突位置更向前移位。在 II 类患者中,髁突位置主要为同心和后移。

结论

不同 Angle 分类之间,髁突形态、关节间隙、关节窝形态和髁突位置存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验