• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床毒理学中,存在美托洛尔时,安非他命和 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺免疫测定出现假阳性——两例报告。

False positive amphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine immunoassays in the presence of metoprolol-two cases reported in clinical toxicology.

机构信息

Service de Toxicologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France.

Service de Réanimation Médicale et Toxicologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2020 Mar 7;44(2):200-205. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkz051.

DOI:10.1093/jat/bkz051
PMID:31384953
Abstract

Amphetamines, frequently used recreational drugs with high risk of toxicity, are commonly included in urine drug screens. This screening is based on enzyme immunoassay, which is a quick and easy-to-perform technique, but may lack specificity resulting from cross-reactivity with other compounds, causing false positive results. We present two cases of presumed false positive MULTIGENT® amphetamine/methamphetamine and MULTIGENT® ecstasy (Abbott®) immunoassays with the beta-blocker metoprolol. Both metoprolol-poisoned patients presented positive urine screening despite no history of drug abuse. No confirmation for amphetamine molecular structures was found with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The cross-reactivity was further investigated by doping urine samples with metoprolol and its two major phase-I metabolites. Metoprolol showed positive results for both amphetamine and MDMA tests at low concentrations (200 and 150 μg/mL, respectively). Metoprolol metabolites cross-reacted with the amphetamines immunoassay only, but at higher concentrations (i.e., 2000 μg/mL for α-hydroxymetoprolol and 750 μg/mL for O-demethylmetoprolol). In conclusion, false positive results in amphetamines and MDMA immunoassays are possible in the presence of metoprolol. Toxicologists should be aware of frequent analytical interferences with immunoassays and a detailed medication history should be taken into consideration for interpretation. In vitro investigation of suspected cross-reactivity should include not only the parent drug but also its related metabolites.

摘要

安非他命是一种常被滥用的高毒性娱乐性药物,通常包含在尿液药物筛查中。这种筛查基于酶免疫分析,这是一种快速简便的技术,但由于与其他化合物的交叉反应,可能缺乏特异性,导致假阳性结果。我们报告了两例假定的假阳性 MULTIGENT®安非他命/甲基苯丙胺和 MULTIGENT®摇头丸(雅培)免疫分析与β受体阻滞剂美托洛尔。两名美托洛尔中毒患者的尿液筛查均呈阳性,尽管无药物滥用史。气相色谱-质谱法未发现安非他命分子结构的确认。通过用美托洛尔及其两种主要的 I 相代谢物掺杂尿液样本进一步研究了交叉反应性。美托洛尔在低浓度(分别为 200 和 150μg/mL)下对安非他命和 MDMA 测试均显示阳性结果。美托洛尔代谢物仅与安非他命免疫分析发生交叉反应,但浓度较高(即α-羟美托洛尔为 2000μg/mL,O-去甲美托洛尔为 750μg/mL)。总之,美托洛尔存在时,安非他命和 MDMA 免疫分析可能出现假阳性结果。毒理学家应注意免疫分析中经常出现的分析干扰,应考虑详细的用药史进行解释。疑似交叉反应性的体外研究不仅应包括母体药物,还应包括其相关代谢物。

相似文献

1
False positive amphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine immunoassays in the presence of metoprolol-two cases reported in clinical toxicology.在临床毒理学中,存在美托洛尔时,安非他命和 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺免疫测定出现假阳性——两例报告。
J Anal Toxicol. 2020 Mar 7;44(2):200-205. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkz051.
2
Performance characteristics of selected immunoassays for preliminary test of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methamphetamine, and related drugs in urine specimens.用于尿液标本中3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺、甲基苯丙胺及相关药物初步检测的特定免疫分析方法的性能特征
J Anal Toxicol. 2003 Oct;27(7):471-8. doi: 10.1093/jat/27.7.471.
3
Comparison and evaluation of DRI methamphetamine, DRI ecstasy, Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine, and a modified Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine screening immunoassays for the detection of amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MTH), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in human urine.用于检测人尿中苯丙胺(AMP)、甲基苯丙胺(MTH)、3,4-亚甲基二氧基苯丙胺(MDA)和3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)的DRI甲基苯丙胺、DRI摇头丸、Abuscreen ONLINE苯丙胺以及改良的Abuscreen ONLINE苯丙胺筛查免疫分析法的比较与评估。
J Anal Toxicol. 2003 Jul-Aug;27(5):265-9. doi: 10.1093/jat/27.5.265.
4
Evaluation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine concentrations in human urine samples and a comparison of the specificity of DRI amphetamines and Abuscreen online (KIMS) amphetamines screening immunoassays.人体尿液样本中麻黄碱、伪麻黄碱和苯丙醇胺浓度的评估以及药物滥用认定(DRI)安非他明和在线阿布斯creen(KIMS)安非他明筛查免疫分析特异性的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Jan;49(1):160-4.
5
Comparison of three commercial amphetamine immunoassays for detection of methamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and methylenedioxyethylamphetamine.三种用于检测甲基苯丙胺、亚甲二氧基苯丙胺、亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺和亚甲二氧基乙基苯丙胺的商用苯丙胺免疫分析法的比较。
J Anal Toxicol. 1988 Jul-Aug;12(4):229-33. doi: 10.1093/jat/12.4.229.
6
False-positive amphetamine/ecstasy (MDMA/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) (CEDIA) and ecstasy (MDMA/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) (DRI) test results with fenofibrate.非那贝特可导致安非他命/摇头丸(MDMA/3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺)(CEDIA)和摇头丸(MDMA/3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺)(DRI)检测结果呈假阳性。
Ther Drug Monit. 2012 Oct;34(5):493-5. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182690127..
7
False-Positive Amphetamines in Urine Drug Screens: A 6-Year Review.尿液药物筛查中安非他命的假阳性:一项 6 年回顾。
J Anal Toxicol. 2023 Mar 24;47(3):263-270. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkac089.
8
Differentiation of amphetamine/methamphetamine and other cross-immunoreactive sympathomimetic amines in urine samples by serial dilution testing.通过系列稀释试验鉴别尿液样本中的苯丙胺/甲基苯丙胺及其他交叉免疫反应性拟交感神经胺。
Clin Chem. 2006 Apr;52(4):743-6. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.060616. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
9
Lack of Detection of New Amphetamine-Like Drugs Using Conventional Urinary Immunoassays.使用传统尿液免疫分析法未能检测到新型苯丙胺类药物。
Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Feb;40(1):135-139. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000475.
10
Profiles of urine samples taken from Ecstasy users at Rave parties: analysis by immunoassays, HPLC, and GC-MS.锐舞派对上摇头丸使用者尿液样本的概况:免疫分析、高效液相色谱法和气相色谱 - 质谱联用分析
J Anal Toxicol. 2001 May-Jun;25(4):258-69. doi: 10.1093/jat/25.4.258.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.国际刑警组织2019 - 2022年毒理学审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023;6:100303. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100303. Epub 2022 Dec 29.