Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Nov;46(6):821-832. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00962-x.
We examined practitioners' use of the transdiagnostic Modular Approach to Therapy for Children (MATCH) 7 years after learning MATCH for a clinical trial. The practitioners (N = 29; M = 52.10, SD = 12.29, 86% women, 97% white) reported using MATCH with 55% of their caseload; use of the various MATCH modules ranged from 39 to 70%. Use was positively associated with amount of MATCH experience in the trial, perceived effectiveness, and ease of implementation. Patterns of specific module use did not consistently match strength of prior evidence (e.g., exposure was least used of the anxiety modules), suggesting challenges for implementation science.
我们在学习用于临床试验的 Modular Approach to Therapy for Children (MATCH) 7 年后，考察了从业者对该方法的使用情况。这些从业者（N=29；M=52.10，SD=12.29，86%为女性，97%为白人）报告称，他们将 MATCH 应用于 55%的病例；各种 MATCH 模块的使用率从 39%到 70%不等。使用 MATCH 的频率与试验中的 MATCH 经验、感知的有效性和实施的容易程度呈正相关。特定模块使用的模式并不总是与先前证据的强度（例如，暴露是焦虑模块中使用最少的）相匹配，这表明在实施科学方面存在挑战。
