Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):110-121. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1466. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
The increased pain sensitivity following reduced sleep may be related to changes in cortical processing of nociceptive stimuli. Expectations shape pain perception and can inhibit (placebo) or enhance (nocebo) pain. Sleep restriction appears to enhance placebo responses; however, whether sleep restriction also affects nocebo responses remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine whether sleep restriction facilitates nocebo-induced changes in pain and pain-evoked cortical potentials.
In an experimental study with a crossover design, the sensitivity to electrically induced pain was determined in 53 nurses under two sleep conditions, after habitual sleep and after two consecutive nights at work. Nocebo was induced by conditioning one-third of the pain stimuli. Pain-elicited cortical event-related potentials were recorded by electroencephalography (EEG). Data were analysed both in the time domain (N2P2 amplitude) and in the time-frequency domain (ERP magnitude). Sleepiness and vigilance were also assessed.
Both nocebo alone and sleep restriction alone increased the sensitivity to electrically induced pain. However, no interaction effect was found. Moreover, the magnitude of the pain-elicited responses increased after sleep restriction and decreased after nocebo expectation, suggesting that nocebo is probably not an underlying mechanism for the commonly observed hyperalgesia induced by sleep restriction.
The present work addresses whether sleep restriction, known to increase the sensitivity of the pain system, facilitates nocebo-induced hyperalgesia. Our findings suggest that this is not the case, indicating that the increased sensitivity of the pain system following nocebo and sleep restriction are mediated by different cortical mechanisms.
睡眠减少后疼痛敏感性增加可能与伤害性刺激的皮质处理变化有关。期望会影响疼痛感知,可以抑制(安慰剂)或增强(反安慰剂)疼痛。睡眠限制似乎增强了安慰剂反应;然而,睡眠限制是否也会影响反安慰剂反应尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定睡眠限制是否会促进疼痛和疼痛诱发的皮质电位的反安慰剂诱导变化。
在一项具有交叉设计的实验研究中,在两种睡眠条件下,即习惯睡眠和连续两个工作夜之后,确定 53 名护士对电诱发疼痛的敏感性。通过对三分之一的疼痛刺激进行条件作用来诱导反安慰剂。通过脑电图(EEG)记录疼痛诱发的皮质事件相关电位。数据既在时域(N2P2 幅度)又在时频域(ERP 幅度)进行分析。还评估了困倦和警觉性。
单独的反安慰剂和单独的睡眠限制都会增加对电诱发疼痛的敏感性。但是,没有发现交互作用。此外,睡眠限制后疼痛诱发反应的幅度增加,而反安慰剂预期后则减少,这表明反安慰剂可能不是睡眠限制引起的常见痛觉过敏的潜在机制。
本研究探讨了睡眠限制(已知会增加疼痛系统的敏感性)是否会促进反安慰剂诱导的痛觉过敏。我们的发现表明并非如此,这表明反安慰剂和睡眠限制后疼痛系统敏感性增加是由不同的皮质机制介导的。