• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes.诊室血压和动态血压与死亡率及心血管结局的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 6;322(5):409-420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9811.
2
Dipping Status, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control, Cardiovascular Disease, and Kidney Disease Progression: A Multicenter Cohort Study of CKD.动态血压状况、动态血压控制、心血管疾病和肾脏疾病进展:一项慢性肾脏病多中心队列研究
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Jan;81(1):15-24.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
3
Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators.在老年收缩期高血压患者中使用传统血压与动态血压预测心血管风险。欧洲收缩期高血压试验研究者。
JAMA. 1999 Aug 11;282(6):539-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.6.539.
4
Association of Daytime and Nighttime Blood Pressure With Cardiovascular Disease Events Among African American Individuals.非裔美国人日间和夜间血压与心血管疾病事件的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;4(9):910-917. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2845.
5
Prognostic significance of ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients with history of cardiovascular disease.动态血压对有心血管疾病史的高血压患者的预后意义。
Blood Press Monit. 2008 Dec;13(6):325-32. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32831054f5.
6
Is blood pressure during the night more predictive of cardiovascular outcome than during the day?夜间血压比白天血压更能预测心血管疾病的结局吗?
Blood Press Monit. 2008 Jun;13(3):145-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282fd16cc.
7
Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn-Home study.家庭自测血压比诊室血压更能预测心血管风险:芬兰家庭研究。
Hypertension. 2010 Jun;55(6):1346-51. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.149336. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
8
Prognostic value of reading-to-reading blood pressure variability over 24 hours in 8938 subjects from 11 populations.11 个人群中的 8938 例受试者 24 小时内血压读数间变异性的预测价值。
Hypertension. 2010 Apr;55(4):1049-57. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140798. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
9
Home, automated office, and conventional office blood pressure as predictors of cardiovascular risk.家庭血压、自动办公室血压和传统办公室血压作为心血管风险的预测指标。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Mar;11(3):165-170.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10
Relationship between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Measurements and Mortality.诊室血压测量和动态血压测量与死亡率的关系。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1509-1520. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712231.

引用本文的文献

1
Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients with Heart Failure Registry Study (OOBPM-HF study) in China: study protocol, rationale and design.中国心力衰竭患者门诊外血压测量登记研究(OOBPM-HF研究):研究方案、原理与设计
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 4;15(9):e100482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100482.
2
Study on the ambulatory blood pressure phenotype and its correlation with hemoglobin concentration in untreated hypertensive individuals permanently living in plateau areas.高原地区常住未治疗高血压患者动态血压表型及其与血红蛋白浓度的相关性研究
Hypertens Res. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02350-5.
3
Extreme dipping blood pressure pattern is associated with increased mortality in hemorrhagic stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study.极端血压波动模式与出血性中风患者死亡率增加相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04342-x.
4
Association Between Glycated Hemoglobin and Diabetic Retinopathy in Individuals with Diabetes: A Focus on the Modifying Effect of Ambulatory Blood Pressure.糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白与糖尿病视网膜病变之间的关联:关注动态血压的调节作用
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Jul 15;20:1029-1038. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S514622. eCollection 2025.
5
A study protocol for determining the role of Sympathetic activity in Post-injury outcomes: Impact on sleep and caRdiovascular health InvesTigation (SPIRIT).一项关于确定交感神经活动在损伤后结局中的作用的研究方案:对睡眠和心血管健康的影响调查(SPIRIT)
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0321035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321035. eCollection 2025.
6
Morning vs Bedtime Dosing and Nocturnal Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients With Hypertension: The OMAN Randomized Clinical Trial.高血压患者早晨服药与睡前服药及夜间血压降低情况:阿曼随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519354. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19354.
7
Associations of metabolic status with all-cause mortality among individuals with osteoarthritis: A prospective cohort study.骨关节炎患者代谢状态与全因死亡率的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Orthop Translat. 2025 Mar 17;51:207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.02.004. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Analysis of the Accuracy of Unattended Automated Blood Pressure Measurements and Control of Blood Pressure Thresholds: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.无人值守自动血压测量的准确性分析及血压阈值控制:一项多中心横断面研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Jun;27(6):e70070. doi: 10.1111/jch.70070.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Allisartan Isoproxil/Amlodipine in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Randomised study.阿利沙坦酯/氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效与安全性:一项III期、多中心、双盲、平行组、随机研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1038/s41371-025-01035-3.
10
Optimization of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring during Pregnancy: A Path Toward Risk Stratification Improvement and Management of Hypertensive Disorders.孕期动态血压监测的优化:改善风险分层及管理高血压疾病的途径
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 19;26(5):27235. doi: 10.31083/RCM27235. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
2
Evidence-based proposal for the number of ambulatory readings required for assessing blood pressure level in research settings: an analysis of the IDACO database.研究环境中评估血压水平所需动态读数数量的循证建议:IDACO数据库分析
Blood Press. 2018 Dec;27(6):341-350. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2018.1476057. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
3
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension.加拿大高血压协会《2016年加拿大高血压教育计划血压测量、诊断、风险评估、预防及治疗指南》
Can J Cardiol. 2016 May;32(5):569-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
Accuracy of Death Certificates and Assessment of Factors for Misclassification of Underlying Cause of Death.死亡证明的准确性及潜在死因错误分类的影响因素评估
J Epidemiol. 2016;26(4):191-8. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150010. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
6
Apolipoprotein B improves risk assessment of future coronary heart disease in the Framingham Heart Study beyond LDL-C and non-HDL-C.在弗雷明汉心脏研究中,载脂蛋白B在低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)之外,改善了对未来冠心病风险的评估。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(10):1321-7. doi: 10.1177/2047487315569411. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through.如何解释 AUC 随着额外风险预测标志物的增加而略有增加:决策分析派上用场。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 28;33(22):3946-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.6195. Epub 2014 May 13.
8
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014).日本高血压学会高血压管理指南(JSH 2014)
Hypertens Res. 2014 Apr;37(4):253-390. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.20.
9
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
10
European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.欧洲高血压学会动态血压监测立场文件。
J Hypertens. 2013 Sep;31(9):1731-68. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328363e964.

诊室血压和动态血压与死亡率及心血管结局的关联。

Association of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

机构信息

Studies Coordinating Centre, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 Aug 6;322(5):409-420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9811.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.9811
PMID:31386134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6822661/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Blood pressure (BP) is a known risk factor for overall mortality and cardiovascular (CV)-specific fatal and nonfatal outcomes. It is uncertain which BP index is most strongly associated with these outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of BP indexes with death and a composite CV event.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal population-based cohort study of 11 135 adults from Europe, Asia, and South America with baseline observations collected from May 1988 to May 2010 (last follow-ups, August 2006-October 2016).

EXPOSURES

Blood pressure measured by an observer or an automated office machine; measured for 24 hours, during the day or the night; and the dipping ratio (nighttime divided by daytime readings).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) expressed the risk of death or a CV event associated with BP increments of 20/10 mm Hg. Cardiovascular events included CV mortality combined with nonfatal coronary events, heart failure, and stroke. Improvement in model performance was assessed by the change in the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Among 11 135 participants (median age, 54.7 years, 49.3% women), 2836 participants died (18.5 per 1000 person-years) and 2049 (13.4 per 1000 person-years) experienced a CV event over a median of 13.8 years of follow-up. Both end points were significantly associated with all single systolic BP indexes (P < .001). For nighttime systolic BP level, the HR for total mortality was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.17-1.28) and for CV events, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.30-1.43). For the 24-hour systolic BP level, the HR for total mortality was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.16-1.28) and for CV events, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.37-1.54). With adjustment for any of the other systolic BP indexes, the associations of nighttime and 24-hour systolic BP with the primary outcomes remained statistically significant (HRs ranging from 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.25] to 1.87 [95% CI, 1.62-2.16]). Base models that included single systolic BP indexes yielded an AUC of 0.83 for mortality and 0.84 for the CV outcomes. Adding 24-hour or nighttime systolic BP to base models that included other BP indexes resulted in incremental improvements in the AUC of 0.0013 to 0.0027 for mortality and 0.0031 to 0.0075 for the composite CV outcome. Adding any systolic BP index to models already including nighttime or 24-hour systolic BP did not significantly improve model performance. These findings were consistent for diastolic BP.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this population-based cohort study, higher 24-hour and nighttime blood pressure measurements were significantly associated with greater risks of death and a composite CV outcome, even after adjusting for other office-based or ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Thus, 24-hour and nighttime blood pressure may be considered optimal measurements for estimating CV risk, although statistically, model improvement compared with other blood pressure indexes was small.

摘要

重要性

血压(BP)是整体死亡率和心血管(CV)特定死亡和非致命结局的已知风险因素。目前尚不确定哪种 BP 指数与这些结果的相关性最强。

目的

评估 BP 指数与死亡和复合 CV 事件的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项来自欧洲、亚洲和南美洲的 11535 名成年人的纵向基于人群的队列研究,基线观察数据收集于 1988 年 5 月至 2010 年 5 月(最后一次随访为 2006 年 8 月至 2016 年 10 月)。

暴露因素

由观察者或自动办公机器测量的血压;测量 24 小时、白天或夜间;以及下降比(夜间读数除以白天读数)。

主要结果和测量指标

多变量调整后的风险比(HR)表示与 20/10mmHg 的 BP 增量相关的死亡或 CV 事件的风险。心血管事件包括 CV 死亡率与非致命性冠状动脉事件、心力衰竭和中风相结合。通过曲线下面积(AUC)的变化来评估模型性能的改善。

结果

在 11535 名参与者(中位年龄 54.7 岁,49.3%为女性)中,2836 名参与者死亡(每 1000 人年 18.5 人),2049 名参与者(每 1000 人年 13.4 人)经历了 CV 事件中位随访时间为 13.8 年。两个终点均与所有单一收缩压指标显著相关(P<0.001)。对于夜间收缩压水平,总死亡率的 HR 为 1.23(95%CI,1.17-1.28),CV 事件的 HR 为 1.36(95%CI,1.30-1.43)。对于 24 小时收缩压水平,总死亡率的 HR 为 1.22(95%CI,1.16-1.28),CV 事件的 HR 为 1.45(95%CI,1.37-1.54)。在调整任何其他收缩压指标后,夜间和 24 小时收缩压与主要结局的相关性仍然具有统计学意义(HR 范围为 1.17[95%CI,1.10-1.25]至 1.87[95%CI,1.62-2.16])。包含单一收缩压指标的基本模型对死亡率的 AUC 为 0.83,对 CV 结果的 AUC 为 0.84。将 24 小时或夜间收缩压添加到包含其他 BP 指数的基本模型中,死亡率和复合 CV 结局的 AUC 分别增加了 0.0013 至 0.0027 和 0.0031 至 0.0075。将任何收缩压指数添加到已经包含夜间或 24 小时收缩压的模型中并不会显著改善模型性能。这些发现与舒张压一致。

结论和相关性

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,较高的 24 小时和夜间血压测量值与死亡和复合 CV 结局的风险增加显著相关,即使在调整了其他基于办公室或动态血压测量值后也是如此。因此,24 小时和夜间血压可能被认为是估计 CV 风险的最佳测量值,尽管从统计学上讲,与其他血压指标相比,模型改善很小。