Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xin-Quan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
MR Application, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Dec;213(6):1247-1252. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21399. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of breath-hold (BH) MRCP with multichannel receiver coils in comparison with conventional navigator-triggered (NT) MRCP at 3 T. We prospectively studied 53 consecutive patients who underwent MRCP with BH sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions (SPACE) and NT SPACE. The acquisition time for each MRCP image was noted. The contrast ratio, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct (CBD) and periductal tissues on 3D MRCP images were evaluated quantitatively. The overall image quality, motion artifacts, and CBD visibility were scored on a 4-point scale by two blinded radiologists. A paired test was used to analyze the differences in the qualitative and quantitative evaluations between the two MRCP acquisition methods. Both MRCP methods were successfully performed for all subjects without any complications. The mean acquisition time of BH MRCP was significantly shorter than that of NT MRCP (18 seconds vs 264.64 ± 89.66 [SD] seconds; < 0.001). The mean SNR, the contrast ratio, and the CNR of the CBD were significantly higher on NT MRCP images than on BH MRCP images (11.58 ± 6.24 vs 8.71 ± 4.21, 0.93 ± 0.04 vs 0.92 ± 0.03, and 15.42 ± 8.04 vs 12.00 ± 5.76, respectively; < 0.05). All visual scores were significantly higher with BH MRCP than with conventional NT MRCP ( < 0.001). Using 3D BH MRCP with a SPACE sequence at 3 T is feasible in clinical patients, yielding significantly better perceived image quality of the pancreaticobiliary tree in a single BH (mean acquisition time, 18 seconds) without losing image quality compared with the conventional NT MRCP.
本研究旨在评估在 3T 磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)中应用多通道接收线圈行屏气(BH)MRCP 的临床可行性,并与传统导航触发(NT)MRCP 进行比较。我们前瞻性地研究了 53 例连续患者,他们分别接受了 BH 采样完善的磁共振胰胆管成像,使用不同翻转角演化(SPACE)和 NT SPACE 进行应用优化对比。记录了每次磁共振胰胆管成像的采集时间。定量评估 3D 磁共振胰胆管成像上胆总管(CBD)和胆管周围组织的对比率、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。由两位盲法放射科医生对整体图像质量、运动伪影和 CBD 可视性进行 4 分制评分。采用配对 t 检验分析两种磁共振胰胆管成像采集方法的定性和定量评估差异。两种磁共振胰胆管成像采集方法均成功地应用于所有患者,没有任何并发症。BH MRCP 的平均采集时间明显短于 NT MRCP(18 秒比 264.64±89.66[SD]秒;<0.001)。NT MRCP 图像的平均 SNR、对比率和 CBD 的 CNR 明显高于 BH MRCP 图像(11.58±6.24 比 8.71±4.21,0.93±0.04 比 0.92±0.03,15.42±8.04 比 12.00±5.76;<0.05)。所有视觉评分均明显高于 BH MRCP(<0.001)。在 3T 下使用 3D BH MRCP 和 SPACE 序列进行临床患者是可行的,与传统的 NT MRCP 相比,在不降低图像质量的情况下,单次 BH(平均采集时间为 18 秒)可显著改善胰胆管树的可感知图像质量。