Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Ireland.
J Athl Train. 2019 Aug;54(8):889-900. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43-18. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
Persistent strength deficits secondary to Achilles tendinopathy (AT) have been postulated to account for difficulty engaging in tendon-loading movements, such as running and jumping, and may contribute to the increased risk of recurrence. To date, little consensus exists on the presence of strength deficits in AT. Consequently, researchers are uncertain about the appropriate methods of assessment that may inform rehabilitation in clinical practice.
To evaluate and synthesize the literature investigating plantar-flexion (PF) strength in individuals with AT.
Two independent reviewers searched 9 electronic databases using an agreed-upon set of key words.
Data were extracted from studies comparing strength measures (maximal, reactive, and explosive strength) between individuals with AT and healthy control participants or between the injured and uninjured sides of people with AT. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Case-Control Study Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias for the included studies.
A total of 19 studies were eligible. Pooled meta-analyses for isokinetic dynamometry demonstrated reductions in maximal strength (concentric PF peak torque [PT] slow [Hedges = 0.52, 44% deficit], concentric PF PT fast [Hedges = 0.61, 38% deficit], and eccentric PF PT slow [Hedges = 0.26, 18% deficit]). Reactive strength, particularly during hopping, was also reduced (Hedges range = 0.32-2.61, 16%-35% deficit). For explosive strength, reductions in the rate of force development (Hedges range = 0.31-1.73, 10%-21% deficit) were observed, whereas the findings for ground reaction force varied but were not consistently altered.
Individuals with AT demonstrated strength deficits compared with the uninjured side or with asymptomatic control participants. Deficits were reported across the strength spectrum for maximal, reactive, and explosive strength. Clinicians and researchers may need to adapt their assessment of Achilles tendon function, which may ultimately help to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.
跟腱病(AT)导致的持续性力量下降被认为是进行跟腱负荷运动(如跑步和跳跃)困难的原因,并且可能会增加复发的风险。迄今为止,对于 AT 中是否存在力量缺陷,尚未达成共识。因此,研究人员对于哪些评估方法可能对临床康复有帮助也不确定。
评估和综合研究跟腱病患者跖屈(PF)力量的文献。
两名独立的审查员使用一套商定的关键词在 9 个电子数据库中进行搜索。
从比较跟腱病患者与健康对照组参与者之间或跟腱病患者受伤侧和未受伤侧之间力量测量值(最大、反应和爆发力)的研究中提取数据。使用关键评估技能计划病例对照研究清单评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
共有 19 项研究符合条件。使用等速测力法进行的荟萃分析显示,最大力量降低(慢收缩 PF 峰值扭矩[Hedges = 0.52,44%缺陷]、快收缩 PF PT[Hedges = 0.61,38%缺陷]和慢收缩 PF PT[Hedges = 0.26,18%缺陷])。反应性力量,尤其是在跳跃过程中,也降低了(Hedges 范围= 0.32-2.61,16%-35%缺陷)。对于爆发力,力的发展速度(Hedges 范围= 0.31-1.73,10%-21%缺陷)降低,而地面反作用力的发现则有所不同,但并没有持续改变。
与未受伤侧或无症状对照组参与者相比,跟腱病患者表现出力量缺陷。最大、反应和爆发力的力量谱都报告了缺陷。临床医生和研究人员可能需要调整对跟腱功能的评估,这最终可能有助于优化康复结果。