Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
National Wildlife Research Centre, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Nov;38(11):2546-2555. doi: 10.1002/etc.4555. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
There is growing interest in developing alternative methods to screen and prioritize chemical hazards, although few studies have compared responses across different methods. The objective of the present study was to compare 3 alternative liver methods derived from white Leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus): primary hepatocyte culture, liver slices, and liver from in ovo injected embryos. We examined hepatic gene expression changes after exposure to 3 chemicals (17β-trenbolone [17βT], 17β-estradiol [E2], and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin [TCDD]) using a custom quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) array with 7 genes (vitellogenin [VTG], apolipoprotein [Apo], cytochrome P450 1A4 [CYP1A4], liver basic fatty acid binding protein [LBFABP], 3β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [HSD3β1], stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase [SCD], and estrogen sulfotransferase [SULT1E1]). Gene expression across the 3 methods was examined using hierarchical clustering. Up-regulation of CYP1A4 in response to TCDD was consistent across all methods, and the magnitude was higher in hepatocytes (>150-fold) compared with slices (>31-fold) and in ovo liver (>27-fold). In hepatocytes, SCD and VTG up-regulation in response to 17βT and E2 was >4-fold and 16-fold, respectively. The rank order of cases with significant changes in gene expression among the 3 methods was: hepatocytes (22) > in ovo liver (11) > liver slices (6). Hierarchical clustering grouped liver slices and in ovo liver as more similar, whereas hepatocytes were grouped separately from in ovo liver. More introspective comparisons are needed to understand how and why alternative methods differ and to aid in their integration into toxicity testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2546-2555. © 2019 SETAC.
人们越来越关注开发替代方法来筛选和优先考虑化学危害,尽管很少有研究比较过不同方法的反应。本研究的目的是比较来自白来航鸡(Gallus gallus domesticus)的 3 种替代肝脏方法:原代肝细胞培养、肝切片和胚胎注射的肝脏:我们使用定制的定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)阵列检查了 3 种化学物质(17β-群勃龙[17βT]、17β-雌二醇[E2]和 2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并对二恶英[TCDD])暴露后肝脏基因表达的变化,该阵列有 7 个基因(卵黄蛋白原[VTG]、载脂蛋白[Apo]、细胞色素 P450 1A4 [CYP1A4]、肝碱性脂肪酸结合蛋白[LBFABP]、3β-羟甾醇脱氢酶[HSD3β1]、硬脂酰辅酶 A 去饱和酶[SCD]和雌激素硫酸转移酶[SULT1E1])。使用层次聚类法检查了 3 种方法之间的基因表达情况。TCDD 引起的 CYP1A4 上调在所有方法中均一致,且在肝细胞中的上调幅度(>150 倍)高于肝切片(>31 倍)和胚胎肝脏(>27 倍)。在肝细胞中,17βT 和 E2 引起的 SCD 和 VTG 上调分别为>4 倍和 16 倍。3 种方法中基因表达显著变化的病例的排序为:肝细胞(22)>胚胎肝脏(11)>肝切片(6)。层次聚类将肝切片和胚胎肝脏归为更相似的类别,而将肝细胞单独归为一类。需要更深入的比较,以了解替代方法如何以及为何存在差异,并帮助将其整合到毒性测试中。Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2546-2555。©2019 SETAC。