• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么有些人的性格不太具有可塑性?

Why are some personalities less plastic?

机构信息

Département des sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 14;286(1908):20191323. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1323. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2019.1323
PMID:31387507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6710596/
Abstract

Individuals from the same population typically show consistent differences in behavioural traits that are frequently associated with differences in contextual plasticity. Yet such a correlation might arise either because some individuals are better able than others to detect environmental changes or because the benefits of being plastic are condition-dependent. To discriminate between these two competing hypotheses, I developed an individual-based model that simulates a population in which individuals of varying fighting ability compete by pairwise interactions using either the fixed hawk (aggressive) or dove (peaceful) strategies or a conditional assessment strategy. As anticipated, the model predicts that only individuals with low (and/or intermediate) fighting ability should use the assessment strategy, giving rise to a negative (or dome-shaped) relationship between aggressiveness and plasticity. The proportion of plastic individuals, however, should be affected not only by the environmental conditions in which individuals live but also by the mechanism that would maintain variation in the traits that determine the benefits of plasticity. In particular, if individual differences in fighting ability may be eroded by natural selection, it predicts that ecological conditions that cause assortative interactions (e.g. high predation risks) would contribute in maintaining variation among individuals in their fighting ability, thereby favouring greater plasticity.

摘要

来自同一群体的个体通常表现出行为特征的一致差异,这些差异通常与环境可塑性的差异有关。然而,这种相关性可能是因为一些个体比其他个体更能察觉环境变化,也可能是因为具有可塑性的好处是条件依赖性的。为了在这两种相互竞争的假设之间做出区分,我开发了一个基于个体的模型,该模型模拟了一个群体,其中具有不同战斗能力的个体通过两两相互作用使用固定的鹰(攻击性)或鸽(和平性)策略或条件评估策略进行竞争。正如预期的那样,该模型预测只有低(和/或中等)战斗能力的个体才应该使用评估策略,从而导致攻击性和可塑性之间呈负(或圆顶形)关系。然而,具有可塑性的个体的比例不仅受到个体所处的环境条件的影响,还受到决定可塑性好处的特征的差异的维持机制的影响。特别是,如果战斗能力的个体差异可能受到自然选择的侵蚀,那么它预测会导致个体之间发生趋同相互作用(例如高捕食风险)的生态条件将有助于维持其战斗能力的个体之间的变异,从而有利于更大的可塑性。

相似文献

1
Why are some personalities less plastic?为什么有些人的性格不太具有可塑性?
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 14;286(1908):20191323. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1323. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
Game theory elucidates how competitive dynamics mediate animal social networks.博弈论阐明了竞争动态如何调节动物社会网络。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02302-6.
3
Distraction sneakers decrease the expected level of aggression within groups: a game-theoretic model.分散注意力的运动鞋会降低群体内预期的攻击水平:一个博弈论模型。
Am Nat. 2004 Aug;164(2):E32-45. doi: 10.1086/422199. Epub 2004 Jun 11.
4
On the coevolution of social responsiveness and behavioural consistency.社会性回应和行为一致性的共同进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):440-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1051. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
5
If animals know their own fighting ability, the evolutionarily stable level of fighting is reduced.如果动物了解自身的战斗能力,战斗在进化上的稳定水平就会降低。
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jan 7;232(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.07.024.
6
Social eavesdropping: a game-theoretic analysis.社会窃听:一种博弈论分析。
Bull Math Biol. 2007 May;69(4):1255-76. doi: 10.1007/s11538-006-9151-3. Epub 2007 Mar 20.
7
Interaction times change evolutionary outcomes: Two-player matrix games.交互时间改变进化结果:双人矩阵博弈
J Theor Biol. 2017 Mar 7;416:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).暴露于捕食风险会使三刺鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus)形成个性。
Ecol Lett. 2007 Sep;10(9):828-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01081.x.
9
Why do some fish fight more than others?为什么有些鱼比其他鱼更爱争斗?
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2012 Nov-Dec;85(6):585-93. doi: 10.1086/668204. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour.动物个性作为竞争行为的原因和结果
Biol Lett. 2015 Mar;11(3). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.1007. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Spider predatory aggressiveness exhibits diverse personality and plasticity associations and complex neurophysiological mechanisms.蜘蛛的捕食攻击性表现出多样的个性和可塑性关联以及复杂的神经生理机制。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01360-0.
2
Context-dependent trait covariances: how plasticity shapes behavioral syndromes.情境依赖的性状协方差:可塑性如何塑造行为综合征。
Behav Ecol. 2020 Nov 17;32(1):25-29. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araa115. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of environmental gradients on individual behaviour: Individual plasticity is consistent across risk and temperature gradients.环境梯度对个体行为的影响:个体可塑性在风险和温度梯度上具有一致性。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Apr;88(4):511-520. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12935. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
Are some individuals generally more behaviorally plastic than others? An experiment with sailfin mollies.某些个体在行为上通常比其他个体更具可塑性吗?一项关于帆鳍鳉鱼的实验。
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 7;6:e5454. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5454. eCollection 2018.
3
Correlational selection on personality and social plasticity: morphology and social context determine behavioural effects on mating success.个性与社会可塑性的相关选择:形态与社会背景决定行为对交配成功的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Mar;86(2):213-226. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12610. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Plasticity varies with boldness in a weakly-electric fish.在一种弱电鱼中,可塑性随胆量而变化。
Front Zool. 2016 Jun 6;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s12983-016-0154-0. eCollection 2016.
5
Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour.动物个性作为竞争行为的原因和结果
Biol Lett. 2015 Mar;11(3). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.1007. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
How the cascading effects of a single behavioral trait can generate personality.单一行为特征的级联效应如何产生个性。
Ecol Evol. 2014 Aug;4(15):3038-45. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1157. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity.社会生态位特化受约束:人格、社会互动和环境异质性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 8;368(1618):20120343. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0343. Print 2013 May 19.
8
Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective.将行为综合征与认知联系起来:行为生态学视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2762-72. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0216.
9
An evolutionary ecology of individual differences.个体差异的进化生态学。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Oct;15(10):1189-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01846.x. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
10
On the evolution of personalities via frequency-dependent selection.基于频率相关选择的人格进化。
Am Nat. 2012 Jun;179(6):679-92. doi: 10.1086/665656. Epub 2012 May 3.