Suppr超能文献

医学院校动机强度修订版(SMMS-R)问卷的结构效度和预测效度:一项法语验证研究。

Construct and predictive validity of the Strength of Motivation for Medical School-Revised (SMMS-R) questionnaire: a French validation study.

作者信息

Abbiati Milena, Severac François, Baroffio Anne, Pelaccia Thierry

机构信息

Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education (EDREM), University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.

Strasbourg University Hospital, France.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2019 Jul 24;10(3):e39-e48. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Motivation is a major indicator of students' learning behaviors. Therefore, researchers require consistent and valid instruments to assess students' motivation. Consequently, motivation has been an important topic in medical education research for the last decade. The present study evaluated the construct and predictive validities of the French version of the Strength of Motivation for Medical School-Revised questionnaire (SMMS-R-FR). Our sample comprised 372 students at three French-speaking medical schools, who filled in the SMMS-R-FR and the Revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R2-SPQ). Results confirmed the three-factor structure of the original SMMS-R questionnaire. Reliabilities were good for the Total Strength of Motivation scale, moderate for the Willingness to Sacrifice and Readiness to Start subscales, and poor (but still acceptable) for the Persistence subscale. Both Total Strength of Motivation and Readiness to Start positively predicted a deep learning approach and negatively predicted a surface learning approach, while Willingness to Sacrifice positively predicted a deep learning approach and Persistence negatively predicted a surface learning approach. Our results both support the SMMS-R- FR's suitability as a tool for measuring motivation in medical students, and suggest that it could be used to guide the development of educational interventions to strengthen motivation.

摘要

动机是学生学习行为的一个主要指标。因此,研究人员需要一致且有效的工具来评估学生的动机。因此,在过去十年中,动机一直是医学教育研究中的一个重要课题。本研究评估了医学院校动机强度修订问卷(SMMS-R-FR)法语版的结构效度和预测效度。我们的样本包括来自三所法语医学院的372名学生,他们填写了SMMS-R-FR和修订后的双因素学习过程问卷(R2-SPQ)。结果证实了原始SMMS-R问卷的三因素结构。动机总强度量表的信度良好,牺牲意愿和准备开始子量表的信度中等,坚持子量表的信度较差(但仍可接受)。动机总强度和准备开始都正向预测深度学习方式,负向预测表面学习方式,而牺牲意愿正向预测深度学习方式,坚持负向预测表面学习方式。我们的结果既支持SMMS-R-FR作为测量医学生动机工具的适用性,也表明它可用于指导加强动机的教育干预措施的制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a618/6681925/2c0562b3253b/CMEJ-10-e039-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验