• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞缪尔·哈特利布谈笛卡尔之死:一封新发现的致亨利·莫尔的信。

Samuel Hartlib on the death of Descartes: a rediscovered letter to Henry More.

作者信息

Penman Leigh T I

机构信息

Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Level 5, Forgan Smith Building, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2015 Dec 20;69(4):361-372. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2014.0055. Epub 2015 May 13.

DOI:10.1098/rsnr.2014.0055
PMID:31390394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4650098/
Abstract

This paper discloses the content of a previously overlooked epistle by the Anglo-Prussian intelligencer Samuel Hartlib to Henry More concerning the death of René Descartes. After a discussion situating the letter within the sequence of the More-Hartlib correspondence, an analysis of the rhetorical structure of the epistle is offered, followed by a brief assessment of Hartlib's attitude towards Descartes, and the identification of his source concerning the news of the philosopher's death. An account of the transmission of the letter via a nineteenth-century periodical is also provided. The text of Hartlib's letter and an overlooked passage of Hartlib's diary concerning Descartes's death, which draws on the content of the More letter, are presented as appendixes.

摘要

本文披露了英裔普鲁士情报员塞缪尔·哈特利布写给亨利·莫尔的一封关于勒内·笛卡尔之死的书信内容,这封信此前一直被忽视。在讨论了这封信在莫尔与哈特利布通信序列中的位置之后,对该书信的修辞结构进行了分析,接着简要评估了哈特利布对笛卡尔的态度,以及他关于这位哲学家去世消息的来源。还介绍了这封信通过一份19世纪期刊传播的情况。哈特利布信件的文本以及哈特利布日记中一段被忽视的关于笛卡尔之死的文字(该文字借鉴了莫尔信件的内容)作为附录呈现。

相似文献

1
Samuel Hartlib on the death of Descartes: a rediscovered letter to Henry More.塞缪尔·哈特利布谈笛卡尔之死:一封新发现的致亨利·莫尔的信。
Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2015 Dec 20;69(4):361-372. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2014.0055. Epub 2015 May 13.
2
Descartes on emotions, reason, and the adaptive unconscious: The pioneer behind the caricature.
Hist Psychol. 2019 Feb;22(1):17-39. doi: 10.1037/hop0000109. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Descartes on Place and Motion: A Reading through Cartesian Commentaries.
Ber Wiss. 2024 Sep;47(3):179-214. doi: 10.1002/bewi.202300011. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
4
From the archives of scientific diplomacy: science and the shared interests of Samuel Hartlib's London and Frederick Clodius's Gottorf.科学外交档案:科学与塞缪尔·哈特利布所在的伦敦及弗雷德里克·克洛迪乌斯所在的哥特夫的共同利益。
Isis. 2015 Mar;106(1):17-42. doi: 10.1086/681035.
5
'One common matter' in Descartes' physics: the Cartesian concepts of matter quantities, weight and gravity.
Ann Sci. 2019 Jul-Oct;76(3-4):324-339. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2019.1709899. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
The mechanical life of plants: Descartes on botany.植物的机械生命:笛卡尔论植物学
Br J Hist Sci. 2019 Mar;52(1):41-63. doi: 10.1017/S000708741800095X. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Henry More and the development of absolute time.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2015 Dec;54:11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
[Scientific revolution and embryology: rejection or transformation of antiquity? A comparison between the procreation teachings of Cesare Cremonini, William Harvey und René Descartes].
Sudhoffs Arch. 2014;98(1):1-27.
9
Faith, Medical Alchemy and Natural Philosophy: Johann Moriaen, Reformed Intelligencer, and the Hartlib Circle John T. YoungFaith, Medical Alchemy and Natural Philosophy: Johann Moriaen, Reformed Intelligencer, and the Hartlib Circle John T. Young History of Medicine in Context Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate, 1998.信仰、医学炼金术与自然哲学:约翰·莫里恩、改革派情报员与哈特利布圈子 约翰·T·扬 信仰、医学炼金术与自然哲学:约翰·莫里恩、改革派情报员与哈特利布圈子 约翰·T·扬 《医学史背景》 汉普郡奥尔德肖特:阿什盖特出版社,1998年
Can Bull Med Hist. 1999 Spring;16(1):169-171. doi: 10.3138/cbmh.16.1.169.
10
The Picture Multiple: Figuring, Thinking, and Knowing in Descartes's (1637).《图像倍数:笛卡尔〈屈光学〉(1637年)中的塑形、思考与认知》
J Hist Ideas. 2017;78(3):369-399. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2017.0022.