Ferreira Larissa A, Sapata Diogo M, Provenzano Maria G A, Hayacibara Roberto M, Ramos Adilson L
Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Odontologia (Maringá/PR, Brazil).
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Aug 1;24(3):64-70. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.064-070.oar.
bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period.
The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes between two types of bonded fixed retainers, conventional 3 x 3 plain retainer (0.8-mm orthodontic wire, bonded to the canines only) and a manufactured braided retainer (0.2 x 0.7-mm stainless steel wire, bonded to all anterior teeth) after use.
a test group of 15 volunteers (aged from 18 to 25 years) used both the conventional retainer and braided retainer for six months. A randomized longitudinal study design, with a two week washout interval, was applied. The dental plaque index, gingival index and dental calculus index were evaluated. Furthermore, the calculus accumulated along the retainer wire was measured and all patients answered a questionnaire about the use, acceptance and comfort of both types of retainers.
the scores for plaque and gingival indexes were higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05) on the lingual and proximal surfaces. The same occurred with the calculus index on the lingual surfaces (p< 0.05). The calculus index along wire was higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05). All patients preferred the conventional retainer, and said that it was also more comfortable to use.
it was concluded that the conventional retainer showed better periodontal indexes than the braided type.
粘结式固定保持器常用于巩固正畸治疗的效果。由于其使用时间较长,所以不能损害牙齿健康,这一点很重要。
本研究旨在比较两种粘结式固定保持器在使用后的牙周指数,即传统的3×3平面保持器(0.8毫米正畸钢丝,仅粘结于尖牙)和一种特制的编织保持器(0.2×0.7毫米不锈钢丝,粘结于所有前牙)。
15名志愿者(年龄在18至25岁之间)组成的测试组使用传统保持器和编织保持器各六个月。采用随机纵向研究设计,洗脱期为两周。评估牙菌斑指数、牙龈指数和牙结石指数。此外,测量沿保持器钢丝积聚的牙结石,并让所有患者回答一份关于两种保持器的使用、接受程度和舒适度的问卷。
编织保持器舌侧和邻面的菌斑和牙龈指数得分较高(p<0.05)。舌侧的牙结石指数也有同样情况(p<0.05)。编织保持器沿钢丝的牙结石指数较高(p<0.05)。所有患者都更喜欢传统保持器,并表示使用起来也更舒适。
得出的结论是,传统保持器的牙周指数比编织型保持器更好。