Geitung J T, Göthlin J H, Uhde A, Aslaksen A
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Eur J Radiol. 1988 Aug;8(3):181-2.
Even though high technology accounts for less than 1% of health care costs in industrialized countries, radiology is often blamed for their escalation. In a squeezed health care economy it is important to know the real cost of diagnostic radiological procedures in order to set priorities and realistic budgets, and to bill (actually or fictively) referring departments, physician's patients, insurance companies etc., and to demonstrate real costs of radiology for politicians and clinicians. The so-called Radiology Points used in the Nordic countries are in our opinion not adequate as basis for "price tags", even if to some extent they do reflect work and expenses involved in an examination. The real costs of ultrasonography (US) and excretory urography (UG) of the upper urinary tract have been compared in a study being performed to determine whether US can replace UG as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease. The cost of US is 53% (high osmolar contrast media) or 27% (anionic contrast media) of UG. If US can replace UG as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease the cost savings will be dramatic, especially if low osmolar or anionic contrast media are routinely used.
尽管在工业化国家,高科技在医疗保健成本中所占比例不到1%,但放射学却常常因其费用上涨而受到指责。在紧缩的医疗保健经济环境中,了解诊断性放射学检查的实际成本非常重要,以便确定优先事项和制定现实的预算,向转诊科室、医生的患者、保险公司等收费(实际收费或虚拟收费),并向政治家和临床医生展示放射学的实际成本。我们认为,北欧国家使用的所谓“放射学点数”不足以作为“价格标签”的基础,尽管它们在一定程度上确实反映了一项检查所涉及的工作和费用。一项正在进行的研究比较了上尿路超声检查(US)和排泄性尿路造影(UG)的实际成本,以确定US是否可以取代UG作为上尿路疾病的首选检查。US的成本是UG的53%(高渗造影剂)或27%(阴离子造影剂)。如果US可以取代UG作为上尿路疾病的首选检查,成本节约将非常显著,尤其是如果常规使用低渗或阴离子造影剂的话。