Chen ZhaoLei, Zhang Xi-Cheng, Sun Yuan, Xu Miao
The Department of Vascular Surgery, The Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
The Department of Vascular Surgery, The Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
The anatomical etiology of right iliac vein compression syndrome (RIVCS) differs from that of left iliac vein compression syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and therapeutic characteristics of RIVCS.
Sixteen patients with nonthrombotic RIVCS were admitted to our hospital from May 2013 to July 2017. All patients underwent computed tomography venography (CTV) examinations of the right lower limb, which indicated that the right iliac veins were compressed by extrinsic structures. RIVCS was divided into 3 types according to the CTV findings. Stenting was conducted in patients with the appropriate indications. The superficial varicose veins in the lower limbs were simultaneously treated during endovascular treatment in a compound operating room. Antiplatelet therapy was administered after discharge.
Most RIVCS cases were types II and III, and the most frequently compressed segments were the middle and distal parts of the iliac vein. Most stents did not require stretching into the inferior vena cava and therefore seldom affected contralateral blood flow. Fifteen patients required stenting; the diameters of the stents ranged from 10 to 16 mm. All symptoms were alleviated, and the ulcers healed postoperatively. The remaining single patient with superficial varicose veins did not have an indication for endovascular therapy. During follow-up, all patients were symptom free, and the stents showed excellent patency.
CTV is a simple, accurate, and important method for diagnosing RIVCS. Endovascular therapy is an effective therapeutic method for RIVCS. Compared with the left side, stent implantation for RIVCS is safer and has fewer effects on contralateral blood flow.
右髂静脉压迫综合征(RIVCS)的解剖学病因与左髂静脉压迫综合征不同。本研究旨在探讨RIVCS的临床特征和治疗特点。
2013年5月至2017年7月,16例非血栓性RIVCS患者入住我院。所有患者均接受了右下肢计算机断层扫描静脉造影(CTV)检查,结果显示右髂静脉受到外部结构压迫。根据CTV检查结果,将RIVCS分为3型。有合适指征的患者进行了支架置入术。在复合手术室进行血管内治疗时,同时处理下肢浅静脉曲张。出院后给予抗血小板治疗。
大多数RIVCS病例为II型和III型,最常受压的节段是髂静脉的中、远端。大多数支架不需要延伸至下腔静脉,因此很少影响对侧血流。15例患者需要置入支架;支架直径为10至16毫米。术后所有症状均缓解,溃疡愈合。其余1例单纯患有浅静脉曲张的患者没有血管内治疗指征。随访期间,所有患者均无症状,支架通畅情况良好。
CTV是诊断RIVCS的一种简单、准确且重要的方法。血管内治疗是RIVCS的一种有效治疗方法。与左侧相比,RIVCS的支架植入更安全,对侧血流影响更小。