Cardiology Division, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Cardiology Division, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;124(7):1069-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
There is no evidence-based treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Although lower heart rates (HRs) provide an unequivocal benefit for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, higher HR might convey important hemodynamic and substrate-modifying benefits in patients with diastolic dysfunction. In a prospective study of 20 stable outpatients with diastolic dysfunction and pacemakers, we evaluated the effects of a 4-week increase in the lower pacemaker rate to 80 beats/min followed by reversal to the previous lower HR setting from weeks 4 to 6. We assessed quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), 6-minute walk test and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Pacing at 80 beats/min significantly improved quality of life and the 6-minute walk test (p ≤0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between the pacing-induced changes in NT-proBNP and baseline QRS intervals (r = 0.31, p <0.01). Stratification by QRS duration revealed that pacing at 80 beats/min led to -21 ± 26% reduction in NT-proBNP in patients with QRS ≤150 ms, whereas QRS >150 ms was associated with a 26 ± 35% increase in NT-proBNP (p <0.01). Patients physiologically paced from the conduction system had a -46 ± 26% reduction in NT-proBNP at 80 beats/min as compared with 4 ± 26% and 13 ± 26% change with pacing from the right atrial appendage and right ventricular apical septum (p = 0.04). In conclusion, increasing the lower rate setting of pacemakers to 80 beats/min in patients with diastolic dysfunction improves quality of life, functional capacity, and NT-proBNP for those patients with a baseline QRS ≤150 ms. These findings suggest that higher HRs may provide meaningful benefits to patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
对于射血分数保留的心力衰竭,目前尚无循证治疗方法。虽然对于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者,较低的心率(HR)提供了明确的益处,但对于舒张功能障碍患者,较高的 HR 可能会带来重要的血液动力学和底物修饰益处。在一项对 20 名稳定的舒张功能障碍和起搏器患者的前瞻性研究中,我们评估了将较低的起搏器率在 4 周内增加到 80 次/分,然后在第 4 至 6 周从较低的 HR 设置恢复的效果。我们评估了生活质量(明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷)、6 分钟步行测试和 N 端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平。以 80 次/分起搏显著改善了生活质量和 6 分钟步行测试(p≤0.05)。起搏诱导的 NT-proBNP 变化与基线 QRS 间隔之间存在强烈的正相关(r=0.31,p<0.01)。根据 QRS 持续时间进行分层显示,在 QRS≤150 ms 的患者中,以 80 次/分起搏可使 NT-proBNP 降低 21±26%,而 QRS>150 ms 与 NT-proBNP 增加 26±35%相关(p<0.01)。与右心房心耳部和右心室心尖间隔起搏相比,心脏生理性起搏从传导系统起搏时,在 80 次/分起搏时 NT-proBNP 降低了 46±26%,而变化为 4±26%和 13±26%(p=0.04)。总之,在舒张功能障碍患者中,将起搏器的较低设置速率增加到 80 次/分可改善生活质量、功能能力和 NT-proBNP,对于基线 QRS≤150 ms 的患者更是如此。这些发现表明,较高的 HR 可能会为左心室舒张功能障碍和射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者带来有意义的益处。