Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58th, The Second Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul 17;2019:2030147. doi: 10.1155/2019/2030147. eCollection 2019.
To assess the efficacy of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and compare DKI-derived parameters with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from benign hepatic nodules including focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), hemangioma, and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA).
151 patients with 182 hepatic nodules (114 HCCs and 68 benign nodules including 33 FNHs, 29 hemangiomas, and 6 HCAs) were analyzed. Preoperative MRI examinations including DKI ( values: 0, 200, 500, 800, 1500, and 2000 sec/mm) were performed, and kurtosis (), diffusivity (), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated. The efficacy of DKI-derived parameters , , and ADC for distinguishing HCC from these benign nodules was analyzed.
ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) analysis showed the optimal cutoff values of ADC, , and for identification of these benign nodules, and HCCs were 1.295 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.826; sensitivity 80.6%; specificity 70.8%), 1.787 (AUC: 0.770; sensitivity 83.6%; specificity 59.6%), and 1.002 (AUC: 0.761; sensitivity 65.5%; specificity 79.0%), respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in ADC, , and values between groups of HCC-FNH and HCC-hemangioma ( < 0.05). There were significant differences in and ADC values between groups of FNH-hemangioma and HCA-hemangioma ( < 0.05), respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, a regression equation was obtained: Logit()=-1.982 +1.385 +1.948( : ADC; : ), and odds ratios (OR) were 0.138 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.052, 0.367), and 8.996 (95% CI: 0.970, 16.460), respectively.
Both ADC value and DKI-derived parameters and values have demonstrated a higher preoperative efficacy in distinguishing HCC from FNH, hemangioma, and HCA. No evidence was shown to suggest or value was superior to the ADC value.
评估扩散峰度成像(DKI)的效能,并比较 DKI 衍生参数与常规扩散加权成像(DWI)在鉴别肝细胞癌(HCC)与包括局灶性结节性增生(FNH)、血管瘤和肝细胞腺瘤(HCA)在内的良性肝结节中的作用。
分析了 151 例 182 个肝结节(114 个 HCC 和 68 个良性结节,包括 33 个 FNH、29 个血管瘤和 6 个 HCA)的术前 MRI 检查,包括 DKI( 值:0、200、500、800、1500 和 2000 sec/mm),并计算峰度()、弥散度()和表观弥散系数(ADC)。分析了 DKI 衍生参数、、和 ADC 鉴别 HCC 与这些良性结节的效能。
ROC(受试者工作特征曲线)分析显示,用于鉴别这些良性结节和 HCC 的 ADC、、和 ADC 的最佳截断值分别为 1.295(AUC:0.826;敏感度 80.6%;特异度 70.8%)、1.787(AUC:0.770;敏感度 83.6%;特异度 59.6%)和 1.002(AUC:0.761;敏感度 65.5%;特异度 79.0%)。HCC-FNH 与 HCC-血管瘤组间 ADC、、值差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。FNH-血管瘤组与 HCA-血管瘤组间、ADC 值差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。采用 logistic 回归分析,得到回归方程:Logit()=-1.982+1.385+1.948(:ADC;:),优势比(OR)分别为 0.138(95%CI:0.052,0.367)和 8.996(95%CI:0.970,16.460)。
ADC 值及 DKI 衍生参数、值在术前鉴别 HCC 与 FNH、血管瘤和 HCA 方面均显示出较高的效能。尚无证据表明、值优于 ADC 值。