Araby Yasser A, Alhirabi Ahmed A, Santawy Abdelaleem H
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Dental Intern, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.
World J Radiol. 2019 Jul 28;11(7):94-101. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i7.94.
Identification of the morphology of the genial tubercles (GTs) is valuable for different dental applications. The morphological pattern of the GTs is still controversial, and therefore, the study of its morphology using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) plays a valuable role in resolving the controversy.
To assess the morphological pattern, dimensions and position of the GTs using CBCT among a selected Saudi population.
CBCT records of 155 Saudi subjects (49 female and 106 male) were used to assess the pattern and size of the GTs and to determine the distance from the apices of the lower central incisors to the superior border of the GTs (I-SGT) and the distance from the inferior border of the GTs to the menton (IGT-M).
The results of this study showed that the most common morphological pattern was of two superior GTs and a rough impression below them (36.8%), followed by two superior GTs and a median ridge representing fused inferior GTs below them (22.6%) and a single median eminence or projection (20%). The classically described pattern, of two superior and two inferior GTs placed one above the other, was found in only 14.2% of cases, while 6.4% of the studied cases had no GTs. The mean width and height were 6.23 ± 1.93 mm and 6.67 ± 3.04 mm, respectively, while the mean I-SGT and IGT-M measurements were 8.26 ± 2.7 mm and 8.13 ± 3.07 mm, respectively.
The GTs are a controversial anatomical landmark with wide variation in their morphological pattern. The most common pattern among the studied Saudi sample was of two superior GTs and a rough impression below them, and there were no significant differences between males and females.
颏结节(GTs)形态的识别对于不同的牙科应用具有重要价值。GTs的形态模式仍存在争议,因此,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)研究其形态对于解决这一争议具有重要作用。
使用CBCT评估特定沙特人群中GTs的形态模式、尺寸和位置。
对155名沙特受试者(49名女性和106名男性)的CBCT记录进行分析,以评估GTs的模式和大小,并确定下颌中切牙根尖至GTs上缘的距离(I-SGT)以及GTs下缘至颏下点的距离(IGT-M)。
本研究结果显示,最常见的形态模式是两个上颏结节及其下方的粗糙压迹(36.8%),其次是两个上颏结节及其下方代表融合下颏结节的正中嵴(22.6%)和单个正中隆起或凸起(20%)。经典描述的模式,即两个上颏结节和两个下颏结节上下排列,仅在14.2%的病例中发现,而6.4%的研究病例没有颏结节。平均宽度和高度分别为6.23±1.93毫米和6.67±3.04毫米,而I-SGT和IGT-M的平均测量值分别为8.26±2.7毫米和8.13±3.07毫米。
颏结节是一个存在争议的解剖标志,其形态模式差异很大。在所研究的沙特样本中,最常见的模式是两个上颏结节及其下方的粗糙压迹,男性和女性之间没有显著差异。