Suppr超能文献

将成本效益分析纳入处方决策是否能促进药物可及性公平?

Does Incorporating Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Into Prescribing Decisions Promote Drug Access Equity?

作者信息

DiStefano Michael J, Levin Jonathan S

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):E679-685. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.679.

Abstract

Using cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to inform prescribing can promote equitable drug access from a utilitarian perspective. Some theorists of equity, such as Rawls or Powers and Faden, however, would not consider CEA as promoting equity, as they endorse nonutilitarian theories of equity. Novel advances in CEA methodology seek to integrate broader equity concerns but may raise transparency concerns. We argue that incorporating CEA into qualitative multi-criteria decision analysis to inform prescribing decisions could promote equity more effectively and transparently than using CEA alone. Such applications should be implemented, along with recommendations, at the health system level rather than be carried out by individual clinicians alone.

摘要

使用成本效益分析(CEA)来指导处方开具,从功利主义角度来看,可以促进药物的公平可及性。然而,一些公平理论学家,如罗尔斯或鲍尔斯和法登,不会认为CEA能促进公平,因为他们支持非功利主义的公平理论。CEA方法的新进展试图纳入更广泛的公平考量,但可能会引发透明度方面的问题。我们认为,将CEA纳入定性多标准决策分析以指导处方决策,可能比单独使用CEA更有效地、更透明地促进公平。此类应用应与相关建议一起,在卫生系统层面实施,而不是仅由个体临床医生来执行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验