Bondarenko Olha S, Pakhomov Volodymyr V, Saulyak Sergey V, Dumchikov Mykhailo O
Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine.
Wiad Lek. 2019;72(7):1354-1358.
Introduction: Corruption, as a socio-economic problem, is characteristic of every society. The aim: To study relevant issues of criminal liability of the private doctors for committing corruption crimes.
Materials and methods: In the article general scientific and special-scientific methods of cognition wer eused which provided an objective analysis of the research purpose.
Review: The article analyzes actual questions of relenant issues of criminal liability of the private doctors for committing corruption crimes. The authors propose to research the criminal responsibility of this specific subject through the prism of the crime, as well as it's elements. Thus, special attention is focused on the analysis of thees sence of the object of the crimes, the responsibility for which provided in. Art. 365-2 and 368-4 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Inaddition, the concept of "unlawful profit" is investigated, in the context of comparison with the "bribe". Thees sence of the objective side of corruption crimes, the subject of which is a private doctor, is explained in detail. In particular, the concepts of "authority", "offer", "promise", etc. Particul arattention is paid to analyzing the legal status of a private doctor as a person authorized to provide public services. The authors focus on the analysis of the subjective side of thes corruption crimes being studied by a private physician. All penalties that can be applied to a private doctor for committing corrupt acts are systematized. At the very end, the issue of the totality of crimes is investigated.
Conclusions: Bringing a private doctor in the responsibility for committing a corrupt act is difficult in there gion, because the criminalization of corruptionactions of suchpersons took place relatively recently, therefore, pre-trial investigation bodies have not yet established a well-established system of tactical and methodological actions that would facilitate this process.
引言：腐败作为一个社会经济问题，是每个社会的特征。目的：研究私人医生实施腐败犯罪的刑事责任相关问题。
材料与方法：本文采用了一般科学和特殊科学的认知方法，对研究目的进行了客观分析。
综述：本文分析了私人医生实施腐败犯罪刑事责任相关问题的实际情况。作者建议通过犯罪及其要素的视角来研究这一特定主体的刑事责任。因此，特别关注对乌克兰《刑法》第365 - 2条和第368 - 4条规定的犯罪对象本质的分析。此外，在与“贿赂”比较的背景下研究“非法获利”的概念。详细解释了以私人医生为主体的腐败犯罪客观方面的本质。特别是，对“职权”“给予”“承诺”等概念进行了阐述。特别关注分析私人医生作为授权提供公共服务人员的法律地位。作者着重分析了所研究的私人医生腐败犯罪的主观方面。对可适用于私人医生腐败行为的所有处罚进行了系统化整理。最后，研究了犯罪竞合问题。
结论：在该地区追究私人医生腐败行为的责任存在困难，因为此类人员的腐败行为刑事定罪相对较新，因此，预审调查机构尚未建立完善的战术和方法行动体系来推动这一进程。
