Suppr超能文献

与每个抽吸相关的最大累积活产率相关的卵母细胞数量取决于女性年龄:221221 个治疗周期的人群研究。

The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, School of Women's and Children's Health and Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney NSW Australia.

School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney NSW Australia.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1778-1787. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez100.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

What is the number of oocytes where the maximum cumulative live birth rate per aspiration (CLBR) is observed during ART in women of different ages?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The maximum CLBR was observed when around 25 oocytes were retrieved in women between 18-35 years of age, around 9 oocytes in women more than 45 years of age and continued to increase beyond 30 oocytes in women between 36-44 years of age.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The live birth rate per fresh or frozen/thaw embryo transfer (FET) procedure has traditionally been the main measure of ART success. However, with the introduction of highly efficient embryo cryopreservation methods, CLBR encompassing live delivery outcomes from the fresh and all subsequent FET following a single ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection is increasingly viewed as a more meaningful measure of treatment success. There is evidence suggesting that larger oocyte yields are associated with increased likelihood of cumulative live birth per aspiration. Whether this association is the same across female ages has not yet been properly investigated.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a large retrospective population-based cohort study using data from the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database (ANZARD). ANZARD contains information from all ART treatment cycles carried out in all fertility centres in Australia and New Zealand. Overall, 221 221 autologous oocyte aspiration cycles carried out between January 2009 to December 2015 were included in the analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Cumulative live birth per aspiration was defined as at least one liveborn baby at ≥20 weeks gestation resulting from an ART aspiration cycle, including all fresh and FET resulting from the associated ovarian stimulation, until one live birth occurred or all embryos were used. Cycles where no oocytes were retrieved were excluded from analysis as there is no possibility of live birth. Analyses of data were performed using generalized estimating equations to account for the clustered nature of data (multiple cycles undertaken by a woman). Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify and adjust for factors known to independently affect cumulative live birth per aspiration. An interaction term between female age and the number of oocytes retrieved was included to assess whether the age of the women was associated with a different optimal number of oocytes to achieve at least one live birth from an aspiration cycle (i.e. the effect-modifying role of female age). The likelihood of cumulative live birth per aspiration was calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The median number of oocytes retrieved was 7 (interquartile range, 4-12) and median age of patients was 36 (interquartile range, 33-40). The overall CLBR was 32.2%. The results from the multivariable regression analysis showedthat the number of oocytes retrieved remained a significant predictor (P < 0.001) of cumulative live birth per aspiration after adjusting for female age, parity and cycle count. Compared to the reference group of 10-14 oocytes retrieved, the adjusted odds for cumulative live birth per aspiration increased with the number of oocytes retrieved: 1-3 oocytes, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20-0.22); 4-9 oocytes, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.55-0.58); 15-19 oocytes, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.34-1.43); 20-24 oocytes, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.67-1.84); and 2.10 (95% CI, 1.96-2.25) with more than 25 oocytes. After stratifying by female age group, the rate of increase in CLBR per additional oocyte retrieved was lower in the older age groups, indicating that higher oocyte yields were more beneficial in younger women. CLBR of patients in the <30 years and 30-34 years age groups appeared to reach a plateau (with only minimal increase in CLBR per additional oocyte retrieved) after retrieval of 25 oocytes at 73% and 72%, respectively, while CLBR of patients in the 35-39 years and 40-44 years age groups continued to increase with higher oocyte yields, reaching 68% and 40%, respectively, when 30 or more oocytes were retrieved. CLBR of patients aged 45 years and above remained consistently below 5%. Findings suggest that the number of oocytes retrieved where CLBR appears to be maximized is around 25 in women between 18-35 years, more than 30 in women between 36-44 years and around 9 in women 45 years and older. However, results for women aged 45 years and older may not be as robust due to the relatively small sample size available in this age group.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: As with all large retrospective database studies, there are potential confounders that cannot be accounted for. Despite the current study being based on complete ascertainment of ART cycles across two countries, ovarian stimulation protocols, oocyte quality parameters and a number of important patient characteristics are not collected by ANZARD. Additionally, a small number of cycles were available for women over 45 years yielding more than 15 oocytes, making these estimates unreliable.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results from this study demonstrate that the number of oocytes retrieved where the maximum CLBR is observed during ART is dependent on female age. This provides information for clinicians and patients to understand the modifying effect of age on the number of oocytes retrieved and the likelihood of success with ART.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. The Fertility Society of Australia funds the National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit to manage ANZARD and conduct national reporting of ART in Australia and New Zealand. Associate Professor Georgina Chambers (G.C.) is employed by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) and is director of the National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit at UNSW. G.C. was also a paid member of the Australian governments Medicare Benefits Scheme taskforce on assisted reproductive technologies in 2017.

摘要

研究问题

在不同年龄段的女性中,ART 中每个抽吸获得的最大累积活产率(CLBR)是多少?

总结答案

在 18-35 岁的女性中,当取出约 25 个卵母细胞时观察到最大 CLBR,在 45 岁以上的女性中取出约 9 个卵母细胞时观察到最大 CLBR,而在 36-44 岁的女性中,当取出超过 30 个卵母细胞时 CLBR 持续增加。

已知内容

新鲜或冷冻/解冻胚胎移植(FET)每个程序的活产率一直是 ART 成功的主要衡量标准。然而,随着高效胚胎冷冻保存方法的引入,包含新鲜和随后所有 FET 从单次卵巢刺激和卵母细胞采集中获得的活产结局的累积活产率越来越被视为更有意义的治疗成功衡量标准。有证据表明,更大的卵母细胞产量与累积活产率增加有关。这种关联在女性年龄之间是否相同尚未得到充分研究。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项使用澳大利亚和新西兰辅助生殖数据库(ANZARD)数据的大型回顾性基于人群的队列研究。ANZARD 包含了澳大利亚和新西兰所有生育中心进行的所有 ART 治疗周期的信息。总体而言,2009 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间进行的 221,221 次自体卵母细胞抽吸周期被纳入分析。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:每个抽吸的累积活产率定义为至少有一个在 ART 抽吸周期中≥20 周妊娠的活产婴儿,包括与相关卵巢刺激相关的所有新鲜和 FET,直到发生一次活产或使用完所有胚胎。未取出卵母细胞的周期被排除在分析之外,因为不可能有活产。使用广义估计方程分析数据,以考虑数据的聚类性质(一个妇女进行的多个周期)。进行单变量和多变量回归分析以确定并调整已知独立影响每个抽吸的累积活产率的因素。包括女性年龄和取出的卵母细胞数量之间的交互项,以评估女性年龄是否与从抽吸周期获得至少一次活产所需的最佳卵母细胞数量(即女性年龄的效应修饰作用)有关。累积活产率的可能性作为优势比(OR)计算,95%CI。

主要结果和机会的作用

取出的卵母细胞中位数为 7(四分位距,4-12),患者的中位年龄为 36(四分位距,33-40)。总体 CLBR 为 32.2%。多变量回归分析的结果表明,取出的卵母细胞数量在调整女性年龄、产次和周期计数后仍然是累积活产率的显著预测因素(P<0.001)。与取出 10-14 个卵母细胞的参考组相比,每个抽吸的累积活产率的调整后优势随着取出的卵母细胞数量增加而增加:1-3 个卵母细胞,0.21(95%CI,0.20-0.22);4-9 个卵母细胞,0.56(95%CI,0.55-0.58);15-19 个卵母细胞,1.38(95%CI,1.34-1.43);20-24 个卵母细胞,1.75(95%CI,1.67-1.84);和 21 个(95%CI,1.96-2.25)卵母细胞。按女性年龄组分层后,年龄较大的组中 CLBR 每增加一个卵母细胞的增长率较低,这表明年轻女性的更高卵母细胞产量更有益。<30 岁和 30-34 岁年龄组的患者的 CLBR 在取出 25 个卵母细胞后分别达到 73%和 72%,达到 plateau(每增加一个卵母细胞,CLBR 仅略有增加),而 35-39 岁和 40-44 岁年龄组的患者的 CLBR 继续增加,当取出 30 个或更多卵母细胞时,分别达到 68%和 40%。45 岁及以上的患者的 CLBR 一直保持在 5%以下。研究结果表明,在 18-35 岁的女性中,CLBR 似乎达到最大值的卵母细胞数量约为 25 个,在 36-44 岁的女性中,卵母细胞数量超过 30 个,而在 45 岁及以上的女性中,卵母细胞数量约为 9 个。然而,由于该年龄组中可用的样本量相对较小,因此 45 岁及以上的女性的结果可能不太可靠。

局限性、谨慎的原因:与所有大型回顾性数据库研究一样,存在无法解释的潜在混杂因素。尽管当前的研究基于两国的 ART 周期完整确定,但卵巢刺激方案、卵母细胞质量参数和许多重要的患者特征并不在 ANZARD 中收集。此外,可用于取出 15 个以上卵母细胞的 45 岁以上女性的周期数量较少,因此这些估计值不可靠。

研究结果的更广泛意义

本研究的结果表明,ART 中观察到最大 CLBR 的卵母细胞数量取决于女性年龄。这为临床医生和患者提供了信息,了解年龄对取出的卵母细胞数量和 ART 成功可能性的修饰作用。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究无外部资金支持。澳大利亚生育协会为新南威尔士大学(UNSW)提供资金,以管理 ANZARD 并在澳大利亚和新西兰进行全国性的 ART 报告。副教授乔治娜·钱伯斯(G.C.)受雇于新南威尔士大学(UNSW),并担任 UNSW 国家围产期流行病学和统计单位主任。G.C. 还在 2017 年担任澳大利亚政府医疗保险福利计划辅助生殖技术工作组的成员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验