Suppr超能文献

[APP(安贝格穿孔项目)——在德国一家二级转诊中心开发并评估一种用于医源性穿孔内镜治疗的跨学科系统方法]

[APP (Amberg-perforation-project) - development and evaluation of an interdisciplinary, systematic approach for endoscopic management of iatrogenic perforation in a German secondary referral center].

作者信息

Decassian Thomas, Dauer Marc

机构信息

Med. Klinik II, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Germany.

Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;57(8):960-970. doi: 10.1055/a-0958-2739. Epub 2019 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been a significant change in the management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation from surgery towards primary endoscopic therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All perforations occurring in all consecutive endoscopies from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2017 in our hospital (Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Germany) were recorded, evaluated and followed up prospectively. In-house SOPs were designed and communicated with all physicians within our hospital. Endoscopic closure of the perforation was primarily attempted, always in consent with the abdominal surgeon.

RESULTS

In total, we observed 24 perforations in 18 627 consecutive endoscopies (0.13 %). There were also 24 cases of free extraluminal gas without perforation (12 post-polypectomy-syndromes und 12 post-ERCP with papillotomy). Diagnosis of perforation could be established within 12 hours in 95.8 % (23/24) (in 20 cases during endoscopy). Initial therapeutic approach was surgical in 3 cases, conservative in 3 cases and interventional-endoscopic closure of perforation in 17 cases (4 × Clips, 10 × OTSC, 3 × SEMS). In 1 case, no therapy was performed. Mortality was 4.2 % (1/24). In 3 cases, the patient had to be operated on secondary to endoscopic therapy. In summary, surgical therapy was necessary in 6 of 24 cases (25 %). Interventional-endoscopic therapy was successful technically in 94.1 % (16/17) and clinically in 87.5 % (14/16).

DISCUSSION

Primary interventional-endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation is a safe and successful option in the everyday practice of a secondary referral hospital. The most important factor is prevention of delay until closure of perforation. Also, interdisciplinary consensus between endoscopist and surgeon is essential. Based on our own data, we developed and introduced a system for documentation and management of all endoscopic complications in endoscopy called "KEMS", which could be successfully integrated in our IT-system.

摘要

背景

近年来,医源性胃肠道穿孔的治疗管理发生了重大变化,从手术治疗转向了主要的内镜治疗。

材料与方法

记录、评估并前瞻性随访了2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日在我院(德国安贝格圣玛丽医院)进行的所有连续内镜检查中发生的所有穿孔情况。制定了内部标准操作流程并与我院所有医生进行了沟通。穿孔的内镜闭合主要尝试进行,且始终取得腹部外科医生的同意。

结果

在18627例连续内镜检查中,共观察到24例穿孔(0.13%)。还有24例无穿孔的肠腔外游离气体病例(12例息肉切除术后综合征和12例乳头切开术后的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后)。95.8%(23/24)的穿孔在12小时内得以确诊(20例在内镜检查期间)。初始治疗方法为手术治疗3例,保守治疗3例,内镜介入闭合穿孔17例(4例使用夹子,10例使用OTSC,3例使用自膨式金属支架)。1例未进行治疗。死亡率为4.2%(1/24)。3例患者在内镜治疗后需进行手术。总之,24例中有6例(25%)需要手术治疗。内镜介入治疗在技术上成功率为94.1%(16/17),临床成功率为87.5%(14/16)。

讨论

在二级转诊医院的日常实践中,医源性胃肠道穿孔的原发性内镜介入闭合是一种安全且成功的选择。最重要的因素是防止穿孔闭合延迟。此外,内镜医生和外科医生之间的跨学科共识至关重要。基于我们自己的数据,我们开发并引入了一种在内镜检查中记录和管理所有内镜并发症的系统,称为“KEMS”,该系统已成功集成到我们的信息技术系统中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验