• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用新型技能、信心和准备指数(SCPI)优化糖尿病自我管理。

Optimizing Diabetes Self-management Using the Novel Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI).

机构信息

LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1873-1878. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0699. Epub 2019 Aug 9.

DOI:10.2337/dc19-0699
PMID:31399439
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI) is an electronic tool designed to assess three dimensions (knowledge, confidence, and preparedness) in a clinically relevant measure with immediate feedback to guide the individualization of patient education. This study sought to assess the validity and reliability of the final SCPI generation, its relevance to glycemia, and its responsiveness to patient education.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In Part 1, patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes were recruited from specialist clinics over a 6-month period and completed the 23-item SCPI using a tablet. In Part 2, participants also underwent a diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. Baseline SCPI score was used to guide the DSME, and SCPI and glycemia were assessed at completion.

RESULTS

In total, 423 patients met inclusion criteria and 405 had evaluable data. SCPI scores were found to have a high degree of validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, with no floor or ceiling effects. Scoring was negatively correlated with HbA (type 1 diabetes: = -0.26, = 0.001; type 2 diabetes: = -0.20, = 0.004). In 51 participants who underwent a DSME intervention (6.4 ± 0.6 visits over a mean ± SD 3.4 ± 0.8 months), mean HbA improvement was 1.2 ± 0.2% (13.1 ± 2.2 mmol/mol, < 0.0001). Total SCPI score and each subscore improved in parallel.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCPI tool is a quick and easy-to-use measurement of three domains: skills, confidence, and preparedness. The instant scoring and feedback and its relationship to glycemic control should improve the efficiency and quality of individualizing care in the diabetes clinic.

摘要

目的

技能、信心和准备指数(SCPI)是一种电子工具,旨在以临床相关的方式评估三个维度(知识、信心和准备),并提供即时反馈以指导个体化患者教育。本研究旨在评估最终 SCPI 生成版本的有效性和可靠性、其与血糖的相关性以及对患者教育的反应性。

研究设计和方法

在第 1 部分中,在 6 个月的时间内,从专科诊所招募了 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者,并使用平板电脑完成了 23 项 SCPI。在第 2 部分中,参与者还接受了糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)计划。使用基线 SCPI 评分指导 DSME,并在完成时评估 SCPI 和血糖。

结果

共有 423 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 405 名患者有可评估的数据。SCPI 评分具有高度的有效性、内部一致性和重测信度,没有地板或天花板效应。评分与 HbA 呈负相关(1 型糖尿病: = -0.26, = 0.001;2 型糖尿病: = -0.20, = 0.004)。在 51 名接受 DSME 干预的参与者(平均 3.4 ± 0.8 个月内进行 6.4 ± 0.6 次就诊)中,平均 HbA1c 改善 1.2 ± 0.2%(13.1 ± 2.2 mmol/mol, < 0.0001)。SCPI 总分和各分项评分均同步改善。

结论

SCPI 工具是一种快速易用的测量工具,可测量三个领域:技能、信心和准备。即时评分和反馈及其与血糖控制的关系应提高糖尿病诊所个体化护理的效率和质量。

相似文献

1
Optimizing Diabetes Self-management Using the Novel Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI).利用新型技能、信心和准备指数(SCPI)优化糖尿病自我管理。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1873-1878. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0699. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
2
Assessment of self-management in patients with diabetes using the novel LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI).使用新型 LMC 技能、信心和准备指数 (SCPI) 评估糖尿病患者的自我管理能力。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;137:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes.中文版 LMC 技能、信心和准备度指数(SCPI)在 2 型糖尿病患者中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01664-x.
4
The LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI): development and evaluation of a novel tool for assessing self-management in patients with diabetes.LMC技能、信心与准备指数(SCPI):一种评估糖尿病患者自我管理的新型工具的开发与评估
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 31;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0606-z.
5
Comparative Effectiveness and Maintenance of Diabetes Self-Management Education Interventions for Marshallese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.比较 2 型糖尿病马绍尔群岛患者的糖尿病自我管理教育干预措施的有效性和维持情况:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):849-858. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1985. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Multisite Study Documenting the Efficacy of Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Interventions in the Management of Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia through Retrospective Chart Review.糖尿病自我管理教育和医学营养治疗:通过回顾性图表审查记录注册营养师干预在血糖控制和糖尿病血脂异常管理中的疗效的多地点研究文件。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):449-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.06.303. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Evaluating self-management behaviors of diabetic patients in a telehealthcare program: longitudinal study over 18 months.评估远程医疗项目中糖尿病患者的自我管理行为:为期18个月的纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 9;15(12):e266. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2699.
9
Effect of diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育对 2 型糖尿病拉丁裔成年人血糖控制的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Digital Intervention to Facilitate Diabetes Self-Management Among People with Schizophrenia and Related Disorders: Development and Acceptability Testing of SMART.一种促进精神分裂症及相关障碍患者糖尿病自我管理的新型数字干预措施:SMART的开发与可接受性测试
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Jun 26;21:1289-1305. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S513272. eCollection 2025.
2
Application of the integrated data platform combined with dietary management for adults with diabetes: A prospective randomized controlled trial.综合数据平台联合饮食管理在成年糖尿病患者中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Nov;15(11):1548-1555. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14296. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Measuring Self-management Among People with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Diabetes-Specific Instruments in English and Chinese.
测量糖尿病患者的自我管理:英文和中文的患者报告糖尿病专用量表的系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2023 Mar;40(3):769-813. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02361-5. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Psychosocial aspects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes in Egypt; a limited resources country perspective.埃及1型糖尿病儿童持续皮下胰岛素输注的社会心理方面;从资源有限国家的视角来看
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Jun 11;14(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00853-6.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes.中文版 LMC 技能、信心和准备度指数(SCPI)在 2 型糖尿病患者中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01664-x.