Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Sporttraumatologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Steinweg 13-17, 26122, Oldenburg, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Dec;46(6):1367-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01195-1. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
Missed injuries are reported in 1.3-65% of all admitted trauma patients. The severely injured patient that needs a higher level of care which requires an inter-hospital transfer has an increased risk for missed injuries. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence and clinical relevance of missed injuries in severely injured patients who require inter-hospital transfer to a level 1 trauma center.
All patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 transferred to the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) between January 2010 and July 2015 were included. Data were obtained from a prospective trauma database and supplemented with information from the patient records. A delayed diagnosis was defined as any injury detected within the first 24 h after the initial trauma, with or without a tertiary survey. Missed diagnoses were defined as any injury diagnosed after 24 h following trauma.
Two hundred and fifty-one trauma patients were included. A total of 88 patients (35%) were found to have ≥ 1 new diagnoses with 65 (26%) patients that had 1 or more delayed diagnoses and 23 (9.2%) patients had 1 or more missed diagnoses (detected > 24 h after injury) after transfer to our hospital. For 47 of the 88 patients (53%), the new diagnoses required a change of management. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was the only statistically significant risk factor for a new diagnosis upon transfer.
Inter-hospital transfer of severely injured patients increases the risk of a delayed detection of injuries. We found that 35% of all transferred patients with an ISS ≥ 16 have at least new diagnoses, with over half of these diagnoses requiring a change of management. Given these findings, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion when receiving a transferred severely injured trauma patient.
据报道,所有入院创伤患者中有 1.3%-65%存在漏诊。需要更高水平治疗的严重创伤患者,即需要院内转院的患者,存在漏诊的风险增加。本研究旨在确定需要院内转院至 1 级创伤中心的严重创伤患者中漏诊的发生率和临床相关性。
纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 7 月期间转入格罗宁根大学医学中心(UMCG)的所有损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥16 的患者。数据来自前瞻性创伤数据库,并辅以患者病历信息。延迟诊断定义为初次创伤后 24 小时内发现的任何损伤,无论是否进行三级检查。漏诊定义为创伤后 24 小时后诊断的任何损伤。
共纳入 251 例创伤患者。共有 88 例(35%)患者发现≥1 个新诊断,其中 65 例(26%)患者有 1 个或多个延迟诊断,23 例(9.2%)患者有 1 个或多个漏诊(在损伤后>24 小时发现)在转至我院后。88 例患者中有 47 例(53%)新诊断需要改变治疗方案。格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)是转院时出现新诊断的唯一具有统计学意义的危险因素。
严重创伤患者的院内转院增加了损伤漏诊的风险。我们发现,所有 ISS≥16 的转院患者中有 35%至少存在新的诊断,其中超过一半的诊断需要改变治疗方案。鉴于这些发现,临床医生在接收转院的严重创伤患者时应保持高度警惕。