• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三相分配预测除草剂在半渗透膜中的迁移。

Predicting herbicide movement across semi-permeable membranes using three phase partitioning.

机构信息

Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, 1177 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, 171 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.

出版信息

Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2019 Sep;159:22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.05.009
PMID:31400780
Abstract

Herbicide efficacy depends on herbicides crossing cell and organelle membranes. We evaluated an artificial membrane system to understand how herbicides cross biological membranes. This understanding aids in predicting herbicide behavior in planta and, consequently, efficacy, mode of action, and whether active transporter-based herbicide resistance mechanisms may be possible. Five herbicides with different log K and pK values were assessed: glyphosate, 2,4-D, clopyralid, sulfentrazone and glufosinate. The artificial membrane apparatus included four semipermeable membranes containing buffers with pH 2.7, 5 and/or 7.4, floating in a bath of diethyl ether. These conditions were based on the pH from different cellular compartments and the pK for these herbicides. Changes in herbicide concentration due to movement were measured using radioactivity or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. In general, herbicide behavior followed the pattern predicted by their calculated pK and log K. Herbicides added to an acidic phase (pH 2.7) were more mobile than when they were added to the more basic phase (pH 7.4), except when herbicide's pK was lower than the pH of the starting phase. Clopyralid, 2,4-D, and sulfentrazone showed significant acid trapping behavior due to their weak acid functional groups. Sulfentrazone and 2,4-D had a high affinity for the nonpolar, diethyl ether bath, especially when they were protonated at low pH. Our findings illustrate the robustness of the system to provide predictions about herbicide behavior at the subcellular level.

摘要

除草剂的功效取决于除草剂是否能穿过细胞膜和细胞器膜。我们评估了一种人工膜系统,以了解除草剂如何穿过生物膜。这种理解有助于预测除草剂在植物体内的行为,从而预测其功效、作用模式,以及是否可能存在基于主动转运体的除草剂抗性机制。我们评估了 5 种 log K 和 pK 值不同的除草剂:草甘膦、2,4-D、氯吡嘧磺隆、唑嘧磺草胺和草铵膦。人工膜装置包括四个半透膜,其中含有 pH 值为 2.7、5 和/或 7.4 的缓冲液,漂浮在乙醚浴中。这些条件基于不同细胞区室的 pH 值和这些除草剂的 pK 值。使用放射性或液相色谱质谱法测量由于移动而导致的除草剂浓度变化。一般来说,除草剂的行为符合其计算的 pK 和 log K 预测的模式。添加到酸性相(pH 2.7)的除草剂比添加到碱性相(pH 7.4)的除草剂更具移动性,除非除草剂的 pK 值低于起始相的 pH 值。由于其弱酸性官能团,氯吡嘧磺隆、2,4-D 和唑嘧磺草胺表现出明显的酸捕获行为。当磺丁噁唑啉和 2,4-D 在低 pH 下质子化时,它们对非极性乙醚浴具有很高的亲和力。我们的发现说明了该系统的稳健性,可用于预测亚细胞水平的除草剂行为。

相似文献

1
Predicting herbicide movement across semi-permeable membranes using three phase partitioning.使用三相分配预测除草剂在半渗透膜中的迁移。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2019 Sep;159:22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Isolation and characteristics of sulfentrazone-degrading bacteria.嘧磺隆降解菌的分离与特性
J Environ Sci Health B. 2017 Feb;52(2):115-121. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2016.1248136. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
Non-target-site glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis is based on modified subcellular distribution of the herbicide.野塘蒿对草甘膦的非靶标位点抗性基于除草剂亚细胞分布的改变。
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Jan;73(1):246-253. doi: 10.1002/ps.4293. Epub 2016 May 20.
4
Potential microbial toxicity and non-target impact of different concentrations of glyphosate-containing herbicide (GCH) in a model Pervious Paving System.含草甘膦除草剂不同浓度对模型透水性铺面系统中潜在微生物毒性和非靶标影响。
Chemosphere. 2014 Apr;100:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.091. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
5
Physiological Factors Affecting Uptake and Translocation of Glufosinate.影响草甘膦吸收和转运的生理因素。
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Mar 11;68(10):3026-3032. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07046. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Assessment of Envi-Carb™ as a passive sampler binding phase for acid herbicides without pH adjustment.评估 Envi-Carb™ 作为一种无需 pH 调整的酸性除草剂的被动采样结合相。
Chemosphere. 2014 May;103:306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.075. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
7
Role of Glutamine Synthetase Isogenes and Herbicide Metabolism in the Mechanism of Resistance to Glufosinate in L. spp. Biotypes from Oregon.奥勒冈州 L. 生物型对草铵膦抗性的机制与谷氨酰胺合成酶同工基因和除草剂代谢的关系。
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Aug 7;67(31):8431-8440. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01392. Epub 2019 May 26.
8
Metabolism of the phosphonate herbicide glyphosate by a non-nitrate-utilizing strain of Penicillium chrysogenum.
Pest Manag Sci. 2001 Sep;57(9):815-21. doi: 10.1002/ps.366.
9
Bacterial degradation of phenoxy herbicide mixtures 2,4-D and MCPP.苯氧基除草剂混合物2,4-滴和灭草灵的细菌降解
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Aug;47(2):222-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01688644.
10
Delayed degradation in soil of foliar herbicides glyphosate and sulcotrione previously absorbed by plants: consequences on herbicide fate and risk assessment.植物叶面吸收的草甘膦和硫草酮在土壤中延迟降解:对除草剂命运和风险评估的影响。
Chemosphere. 2009 Oct;77(4):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.044. Epub 2009 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Modern Approaches for the Development of New Herbicides Based on Natural Compounds.基于天然化合物的新型除草剂开发的现代方法
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;12(2):234. doi: 10.3390/plants12020234.
2
Non-target-Site Resistance in spp. Globally: A Review.全球**种**中的非靶标位点抗性:综述。 注:原文中“ spp.”表述不完整,不太明确具体所指物种,这里保留原样翻译。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jan 22;11:609209. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.609209. eCollection 2020.