Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Parasitol. 2019 Sep;49(10):759-767. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
Virulence, the negative impact of parasites on their hosts, typically increases with parasite dose. Parasites and hosts often compete for host resources and more parasites will consume more resources. Depending on the mechanism of competition, increasing host resources can benefit the host. Additional resources can also be harmful when the parasites are the main beneficiaries. Then, the parasites will thrive and virulence increases. While parasite dose is often easy to manipulate, it is less trivial to experimentally scale host resources. Here, we study a system with external host resources that can be easily manipulated: Nicrophorus burying beetles reproduce on vertebrate carcasses, with larger carcasses yielding more beetle offspring. Phoretic Poecilochirus mites reproduce alongside the beetles and reduce beetle fitness. The negative effect of mites could be due to competition for the carrion between beetle and mite offspring. We manipulated mite dose and carcass size to better understand the competition between the symbionts. We found that mite dose itself was not a strong predictor of virulence. Instead, the number of mite offspring determined beetle fitness. At larger doses, there was strong competition among adult parental mites as well as mite offspring. While increasing the carcass size increased both host and parasite fitness, it did surprisingly little to alleviate the negative effect that mites had on beetles. Instead, relative virulence was stronger on large carcasses, indicating that the parasites appropriate more of the additional resources. Our results demonstrate an ecological influence on the selection of parasites on their hosts and suggest that virulence can be dose-independent in principle.
毒力,寄生虫对宿主的负面影响,通常随着寄生虫剂量的增加而增加。寄生虫和宿主经常为争夺宿主资源而竞争,而更多的寄生虫会消耗更多的资源。根据竞争的机制,增加宿主资源可以使宿主受益。当寄生虫是主要受益者时,额外的资源也可能有害。然后,寄生虫就会茁壮成长,毒力增加。虽然寄生虫剂量通常很容易操纵,但实验性地扩大宿主资源就不那么简单了。在这里,我们研究了一个具有外部宿主资源的系统,这些资源很容易操纵:埋葬甲在脊椎动物尸体上繁殖,较大的尸体产生更多的甲虫后代。寄生性的拟食螨与甲虫一起繁殖,并降低甲虫的适应性。螨虫的负面影响可能是由于甲虫和螨后代之间对腐肉的竞争造成的。我们操纵螨虫剂量和尸体大小,以更好地理解共生体之间的竞争。我们发现,螨虫剂量本身并不是毒力的一个强有力的预测因素。相反,螨虫后代的数量决定了甲虫的适应性。在较大的剂量下,成年亲螨之间以及螨虫后代之间存在着强烈的竞争。虽然增加尸体大小会增加宿主和寄生虫的适应性,但它对减轻螨虫对甲虫的负面影响作用不大。相反,相对毒力在较大的尸体上更强,这表明寄生虫更适合额外的资源。我们的研究结果表明,生态因素对寄生虫对宿主的选择有影响,并表明毒力原则上可以不依赖于剂量。