Department of Sociology, The University of Hong Kong.
Br J Sociol. 2019 Dec;70(5):1904-1925. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12697. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
The sociology of homosexuality lacks engagement with queer theory and postcolonialism and focuses primarily on the global metropoles, thus failing to provide a plausible account of non-Western non-normative sexual identities. This research adopts the author's newly proposed transnational queer sociology to address these deficiencies. First, it critiques the Western model of sexual identity predominantly employed to elucidate non-Western, non-normative sexualities. It does so by examining not only the queer flows between West and non-West but also those among and within non-Western contexts to produce translocally shared and mutually referenced experiences. Second, the proposed approach combines sociology with queer theory by emphasizing the significant role of material, as well as discursive, analyses in shaping queer identities, desires and practices. This article employs the approach to examine young gay male identities, as revealed in 90 in-depth interviews conducted in Hong Kong (n = 30), Taiwan (Taipei, n = 30) and mainland China (Shanghai, n = 30) between 2017 and 2019. More specifically, it highlights the interplay between the state and identity by investigating the intersection and intertwining effects of these young men's sexual and cultural/national identities, revealing three different forms of civic-political activism. The article both demonstrates the way in which sexuality and the state are mutually constituted and provides nuanced analysis of the heterogeneity of contemporary homosexualities in Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China. In applying a new sociological approach to understanding sexuality, this research joins the growing body of scholarship within sociology that is decentring the Western formation of universal knowledge.
同性恋社会学缺乏与酷儿理论和后殖民主义的接触,主要关注全球大都市,因此无法对非西方非规范的性行为提供合理的解释。本研究采用作者新提出的跨国酷儿社会学来解决这些缺陷。首先,它批评了主要用于阐明非西方、非规范性行为的西方性认同模式。它通过考察不仅是西方和非西方之间的酷儿流动,而且是非西方背景之间和内部的酷儿流动,来产生跨国共享和相互参照的经验。其次,所提出的方法将社会学与酷儿理论相结合,强调物质以及话语分析在塑造酷儿认同、欲望和实践方面的重要作用。本文运用这种方法来考察 2017 年至 2019 年间在香港(n=30)、台湾(台北,n=30)和中国大陆(上海,n=30)进行的 90 次深入访谈中揭示的年轻男同性恋者的身份认同。更具体地说,它强调了国家和认同之间的相互作用,通过调查这些年轻男性的性和文化/国家认同的交叉和交织影响,揭示了三种不同形式的公民政治激进主义。本文既展示了性与国家相互构成的方式,又对香港、台湾和中国大陆当代同性恋的异质性进行了细致的分析。通过应用一种新的社会学方法来理解性行为,这项研究加入了社会学中越来越多的将西方普遍知识的形成去中心化的学术研究。