• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德克萨斯州校车安全带的成本效益分析。

Cost-benefit analysis of safety belts in Texas school buses.

作者信息

Begley C E, Biddle A K

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77225.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1988 Sep-Oct;103(5):479-85.

PMID:3140273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1478133/
Abstract

Although safety belts have been shown to reduce the risk of serious injury or death in automobile crashes, evidence of their effectiveness in school buses is uncertain. In this paper, the potential costs and benefits of mandatory safety belts in Texas school buses are estimated, based on the assumption that their effectiveness is less than or equal to rear seatbelt effectiveness in autos. Costs are based on both retrofitting old buses with belts and installing them in new buses. Benefits include the direct and indirect (forgone earnings) cost-savings from preventable injuries and fatalities. Results indicate that a law mandating safety belts in Texas school buses would not be cost-beneficial. Annual benefits would exceed the annual costs of installing belts in new school buses. However, the benefits would not be large enough to compensate for the five-year costs associated with retrofitting old buses.

摘要

虽然安全带已被证明可降低汽车碰撞中严重受伤或死亡的风险,但关于其在校车中有效性的证据尚不明确。在本文中,基于校车安全带有效性小于或等于汽车后排安全带有效性这一假设,对德克萨斯州校车强制使用安全带的潜在成本和收益进行了估算。成本既包括为旧校车加装安全带的费用,也包括在新校车上安装安全带的费用。收益包括因可预防的伤害和死亡而节省的直接和间接(收入损失)成本。结果表明,在德克萨斯州校车上强制使用安全带的法律在成本效益方面并不划算。年度收益将超过在新校车上安装安全带的年度成本。然而,这些收益不足以弥补为旧校车加装安全带所产生的五年成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-benefit analysis of safety belts in Texas school buses.德克萨斯州校车安全带的成本效益分析。
Public Health Rep. 1988 Sep-Oct;103(5):479-85.
2
[Seatbelts on school buses: are they safe for our children?].[校车上的安全带:对我们的孩子安全吗?]
Harefuah. 2008 Aug-Sep;147(8-9):717-21, 749.
3
Should there be laws mandating seatbelts in all school buses? Writing for the pro position.是否应该制定法律强制要求所有校车上都配备安全带?撰写支持该立场的文章。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):8. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200101000-00002.
4
The compelling case for seat belts on school buses.校车上使用安全带的有力理由。
Pediatrics. 1986 Nov;78(5):928-32.
5
Effects of seating position and appropriate restraint use on the risk of injury to children in motor vehicle crashes.坐姿及正确使用约束装置对儿童在机动车碰撞事故中受伤风险的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e305-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1522.
6
A cost benefit analysis of an enhanced seat belt enforcement program in South Africa.南非一项强化安全带执法计划的成本效益分析。
Inj Prev. 2005 Apr;11(2):102-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.007179.
7
Effectiveness of child safety seats vs seat belts in reducing risk for death in children in passenger vehicle crashes.儿童安全座椅与安全带在降低乘用车碰撞事故中儿童死亡风险方面的有效性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jun;160(6):617-21. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.6.617.
8
Injuries to belted older children in motor vehicle crashes.机动车碰撞事故中系安全带大龄儿童的损伤情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Nov;40(6):2024-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
9
Method to evaluate the effect of safety belt use by rear seat passengers on the injury severity of front seat occupants.评估后排乘客使用安全带对前排乘客受伤严重程度影响的方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.05.003.
10
Statistical adjustment for misclassification of seat belt and alcohol use in the analysis of motor vehicle accident data.在机动车事故数据分析中对安全带使用和酒精摄入误分类情况进行统计调整。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Bags, buckles, and belts: the debate over mandatory passive restraints in automobiles.安全气囊、安全带扣和安全带:关于汽车强制使用被动约束装置的争论。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1983 Spring;8(1):44-75. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8-1-44.
2
Attributable risk percent in case-control studies.病例对照研究中的归因风险百分比。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1971 Nov;25(4):242-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.25.4.242.
3
The compelling case for seat belts on school buses.校车上使用安全带的有力理由。
Pediatrics. 1986 Nov;78(5):928-32.
4
The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities.
Accid Anal Prev. 1986 Jun;18(3):229-41. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90007-2.
5
Estimates of motor vehicle seat belt effectiveness and use: implications for occupant crash protection.机动车安全带有效性及使用情况估计:对乘员碰撞保护的影响
Am J Public Health. 1976 Sep;66(9):859-64. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.9.859.