Memon Mubeen A, Faryal Sheeba, Brohi Naveed, Kumar Besham
Pulmonology, Civil Hospital, Jamshoro, PAK.
Intenal Medicine, Civil Hospital, Jamshoro, PAK.
Cureus. 2019 Jun 4;11(6):e4826. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4826.
Introduction Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) can be fatal. In 2012, a comprehensive score was developed to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD called the dyspnoea, eosinopenia, consolidation, acidemia, and atrial fibrillation (DECAF) score. We conducted this study to assess the value of the DECAF score as a clinical prediction tool that claims to stratify all patients with AECOPD by risk accurately. Methods We conducted a prospective study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Department of Pulmonology in Civil Hospital, Jamshoro, from January 2016 to December 2018. Our inclusion criteria were that the patient must be age 35 years or older, have a primary clinical diagnosis of AECOPD, spirometry consistent with airflow obstruction, and have a smoking history of ≥10 cigarette pack per year. We excluded patients who had domiciliary ventilation, survival-limiting comorbidities (such as metastatic malignancy), and a primary reason for admission other than AECOPD. All sociodemographic data were collected at the time of admission, including age, gender, co-morbidities, housebound status, and number of previous AECOPD. Clinical data collected included plain chest x-ray, spirometry, electrocardiogram, arterial blood gases analysis, complete blood count, kidney function test, liver function test, and serum electrolytes. A DECAF score was applied to each patient. We noted in-hospital mortality and compared the characteristics of survivors and non-survivors. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows, version 19.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Results A total of 162 patients were included in the study. The mortality rate was 13% (n=21). More survivors had a DECAF score from zero to three than non-survivors. The difference in the number of survivors vs. non-survivors was statistically significant for DECAF scores zero and one. For DECAF scores four and five, there were more patients in the "non-survivors" group, and the differences were statistically significant. None of the patients scored six on DECAF. Conclusion Patients with a DECAF score of four or higher have a significant risk of mortality. DECAF is a simple tool that predicts mortality that incorporates routinely available indices to stratify AECOPD patients into mortality risk categories.
引言 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)可能致命。2012年,一种综合评分被开发出来用于预测AECOPD患者的院内死亡风险,即呼吸困难、嗜酸性粒细胞减少、实变、酸血症和心房颤动(DECAF)评分。我们开展这项研究以评估DECAF评分作为一种临床预测工具的价值,该工具声称能准确地将所有AECOPD患者按风险分层。方法 我们对2016年1月至2018年12月在贾姆肖罗市民医院肺科重症监护病房(ICU)住院的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。我们的纳入标准为患者年龄必须在35岁及以上,主要临床诊断为AECOPD,肺功能测定结果与气流受限相符,且吸烟史≥每年10包香烟。我们排除了接受家庭通气的患者、有危及生命的合并症(如转移性恶性肿瘤)以及入院主要原因不是AECOPD的患者。所有社会人口统计学数据在入院时收集,包括年龄、性别、合并症、居家状态以及既往AECOPD发作次数。收集的临床数据包括胸部X线平片、肺功能测定、心电图、动脉血气分析、全血细胞计数、肾功能检查、肝功能检查和血清电解质。对每位患者应用DECAF评分。我们记录了院内死亡率,并比较了幸存者和非幸存者的特征。使用IBM SPSS for Windows 19.0版(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)对数据进行分析。结果 共有162例患者纳入研究。死亡率为13%(n = 21)。DECAF评分为零至三分的幸存者比非幸存者更多。对于DECAF评分为零和一分的情况,幸存者与非幸存者的数量差异具有统计学意义。对于DECAF评分为四分和五分的情况,“非幸存者”组的患者更多,差异具有统计学意义。没有患者的DECAF评分为六分。结论 DECAF评分在四分及以上的患者有显著的死亡风险。DECAF是一种简单的预测死亡率的工具,它纳入了常规可得的指标,将AECOPD患者分层到死亡风险类别中。