Suppr超能文献

手术干预是否能为单侧骶骨骨折且移位不明显或无移位的患者提供早期疼痛缓解?

Does Operative Intervention Provide Early Pain Relief for Patients With Unilateral Sacral Fractures and Minimal or No Displacement?

机构信息

Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Banner Health, Tucson, AZ.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Dec;33(12):614-618. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001578.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare pain after operative versus nonoperative pelvic ring injuries with unilateral sacral fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, observational.

SETTING

Sixteen trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Skeletally mature patients with pelvic ring injury and minimally displaced unilateral zone 1 or 2 sacral fractures and without anteroposterior compression injuries.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Pelvic displacement was documented on injury plain radiographs and computed tomography scans; a 10 point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain was obtained in the anterior and posterior pelvic ring during the time of union (12 weeks).

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients with unilateral sacral fractures displaced less than 5 mm, mean age of 38.7, and mean Injury Severity Score of 14.5 were included. Ninety-nine percent had lateral compression injuries, and 62% were in zone 1. Seventy-four percent were treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative patients had more zone 1 fractures (71%, P = 0.004). Nonoperative patients reported mean VAS 2.7 points higher in the posterior pelvis (P = 0.01) and 1.9 points higher anteriorly (P = 0.11) 24 hours after injury compared with patients treated operatively. After 3 months, nonoperative patients reported higher VAS scores than operative patients: 4.0 versus 2.9 posteriorly (P = 0.019) and 3.2 versus 2.3 anteriorly (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

For sacrum fractures with minimal or no displacement, slight differences in the VAS were noted within 24 hours after injury or surgery, but limited differences were seen at 3 months for either operatively treated minimally or undisplaced sacrum fractures. It is unknown whether this represents clinical relevance. These differences were below the minimally important clinical difference for VAS scores for other orthopaedic conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较手术与非手术治疗骨盆环损伤伴单侧骶骨骨折的疼痛。

设计

前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。

地点

16 家创伤中心。

患者/参与者:骨盆环损伤伴最小移位的单侧 1 区或 2 区骶骨骨折且无前后向压缩损伤的骨骼成熟患者。

主要观察指标

骨盆位移在损伤平片和 CT 扫描上记录;在愈合时(12 周),使用 10 分视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估前、后骨盆环的疼痛。

结果

纳入 194 例单侧骶骨骨折且位移小于 5mm 的患者,平均年龄 38.7 岁,损伤严重度评分(ISS)平均为 14.5。99%为侧方挤压伤,62%为 1 区骨折。74%患者采用非手术治疗。非手术患者的 1 区骨折更多(71%,P=0.004)。与手术治疗患者相比,非手术患者在受伤后 24 小时后,后骨盆 VAS 平均高 2.7 分(P=0.01),前骨盆高 1.9 分(P=0.11)。3 个月后,非手术患者的 VAS 评分高于手术患者:后骨盆 4.0 比 2.9(P=0.019),前骨盆 3.2 比 2.3(P=0.035)。

结论

对于轻微或无移位的骶骨骨折,在受伤或手术后 24 小时内,VAS 评分略有差异,但在手术治疗的轻度或无移位骶骨骨折 3 个月时,差异有限。尚不清楚这是否代表临床相关性。这些差异低于其他骨科疾病 VAS 评分的最小临床重要差异。

证据水平

治疗性 II 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验