• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field.标准化引文计量作者数据库,标注了科学领域。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 12;17(8):e3000384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.跨学科的多种引用指标及其综合指标
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 1;14(7):e1002501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501. eCollection 2016 Jul.
3
Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors.将引用数据与撤稿数据相联系,揭示了高被引作者群体中科学撤稿的相关情况。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 30;23(1):e3002999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002999. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article.学术出版物中的名誉作者泛滥?当前基于引文的评价指标的使用如何使每篇多作者文章中诚实的贡献者变成(伪)名誉作者。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):509-12. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100568. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
5
Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine.法医学和法医学领域高被引科学家的科学计量学评估。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Mar;135(2):701-707. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02491-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
[Equally or equitably? Author roles and co-author shares in scientific publication].[同等还是公平?科学出版物中的作者角色与共同作者份额]
Orv Hetil. 2016 Mar 27;157(13):512-6. doi: 10.1556/650.2016.30418.
7
Massive covidization and subsequent decovidization of the scientific literature involved 2 million authors.科学文献中大量关于新冠的内容以及随后的去新冠化涉及200万名作者。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;180:111705. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111705. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
8
Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context.研究人员和作者影响力指标:多样性、价值和背景。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Apr 18;33(18):e139. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e139. eCollection 2018 Apr 30.
9
Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics.定量研究评估:使用指标对抗被操纵的指标。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;19(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03447-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
10
Anchoring effects in the assessment of papers: The proposal for an empirical survey of citing authors.锚定效应在论文评估中的作用:引用作者实证调查的建议。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 29;16(9):e0257307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257307. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Correlate of QS Subject Ranking and Stanford's Top 2% Scientists in Top Dental Schools.QS学科排名与顶尖牙科学院中斯坦福大学前2%科学家的关键关联因素。
Int Dent J. 2025 Aug 12;75(5):100954. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100954.
2
Features and signals in precocious citation impact: A meta-research study.早熟引用影响力中的特征与信号:一项元研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0328531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328531. eCollection 2025.
3
The growth and standing of Australian psychology research: a snapshot.澳大利亚心理学研究的发展与现状:简要概述
Aust J Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;77(1):2485473. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2485473. eCollection 2025.
4
Analysis of the overall development trends and hotspots in the research field of the human gut virome.人类肠道病毒组研究领域的整体发展趋势与热点分析
Virol J. 2025 Jul 5;22(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02856-x.
5
Global research on the utilization of population pharmacokinetic model: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2024.全球人群药代动力学模型应用研究:2000年至2024年的文献计量分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 12;16:1548023. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548023. eCollection 2025.
6
Production and impact of Italian researchers in physical-Sport education and sport pedagogy.意大利研究人员在体育教育和运动教学法方面的成果与影响。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 May 6;10:1478317. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1478317. eCollection 2025.
7
Trends in self-citation rates in high-impact neurology, neuroscience, and psychiatry journals.高影响力神经学、神经科学和精神病学期刊的自引率趋势。
Elife. 2025 May 14;12:RP88540. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88540.
8
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Orchitis Research from 1980 to 2023.1980年至2023年睾丸炎研究的综合文献计量分析
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1469:207-243. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82990-1_10.
9
Scientific racism as a public health emergency of global concern.科学种族主义是一个全球关注的公共卫生突发事件。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Mar 4;44:101049. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101049. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Bibliometric Indexes - Advantages and Limitations in Practical Application, for the Scientific Validity of Authors and Their Scientific Contents - Stanford Bibliometric List: Truths and Misconceptions.文献计量指标——实际应用中的优势与局限,关乎作者及其科学内容的科学有效性——斯坦福文献计量列表:真相与误解
Acta Inform Med. 2024;32(3-4):160-176. doi: 10.5455/aim.2024.32.160-176.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.评估科学家以进行招聘、晋升和终身职位。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 29;16(3):e2004089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.跨学科的多种引用指标及其综合指标
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 1;14(7):e1002501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501. eCollection 2016 Jul.
3
Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices.元研究:研究方法与实践的评估和改进
PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 2;13(10):e1002264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.文献计量学:《莱顿研究指标宣言》
Nature. 2015 Apr 23;520(7548):429-31. doi: 10.1038/520429a.

标准化引文计量作者数据库,标注了科学领域。

A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine, Health Research and Policy, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Research Intelligence, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 12;17(8):e3000384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384. eCollection 2019 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384
PMID:31404057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6699798/
Abstract

Citation metrics are widely used and misused. We have created a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator. Separate data are shown for career-long and single-year impact. Metrics with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are given. Scientists are classified into 22 scientific fields and 176 subfields. Field- and subfield-specific percentiles are also provided for all scientists who have published at least five papers. Career-long data are updated to end of 2017 and to end of 2018 for comparison.

摘要

引文计量指标被广泛应用,但也被误用。我们创建了一个包含 10 万名顶尖科学家的公开数据库,其中提供了标准化的引文、h 指数、合著调整后的 hm 指数、不同作者位置论文的引文以及综合指标等信息。分别展示了终身影响和单年影响的数据。给出了包含和不包含自引的指标以及引文与被引论文的比例。科学家们被分为 22 个科学领域和 176 个细分领域。对于至少发表过五篇论文的所有科学家,还提供了领域和子领域特定的百分位数。终身数据更新至 2017 年底和 2018 年底,以便进行比较。