• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of modified pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trail.改良肺康复对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Jun 27;4(3):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.011. eCollection 2017 Jul 10.
2
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).吸气肌训练,联合或不联合肺康复治疗,用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 6;1(1):CD013778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013778.pub2.
3
Tiotropium and exercise training in COPD patients: effects on dyspnea and exercise tolerance.噻托溴铵与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的运动训练:对呼吸困难和运动耐力的影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(4):771-80. doi: 10.2147/copd.s3935.
4
Effectiveness of 12-week inspiratory muscle training with manual therapy in patients with COPD: A randomized controlled study.12周吸气肌训练联合手法治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Clin Respir J. 2022 Apr;16(4):317-328. doi: 10.1111/crj.13486. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
The effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with concurrent presence of comorbid depression and anxiety.肺康复对同时合并抑郁和焦虑的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效。
Respir Med. 2022 Jun;197:106850. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106850. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
6
Does inspiratory muscle training provide additional benefits during pulmonary rehabilitation in people with interstitial lung disease? A randomized control trial.吸气肌训练对间质性肺疾病患者的肺康复是否有额外益处?一项随机对照试验。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;39(3):518-528. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.2024311. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
The Short-Term Efficacy of a Three-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program among Patients with Obstructive Lung Diseases.一项为期三周的肺部康复计划对阻塞性肺疾病患者的短期疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 27;13(9):2576. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092576.
8
Efficacy and safety of pulmonary rehabilitation training on lung function, quality of life, and T cell immune function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial.肺康复训练对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能、生活质量和 T 细胞免疫功能的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 May;11(5):1774-1785. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-451.
9
Evaluating a Web-Based Coaching Program Using Electronic Health Records for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.在中国,使用电子健康记录评估针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的基于网络的指导项目:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 21;19(7):e264. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6743.
10
Predictors of premature discontinuation and prevalence of dropouts from a pulmonary rehabilitation program in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复计划提前终止的预测因素及退出率
Respir Med. 2022 Mar;193:106742. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106742. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中的肺康复
Cureus. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e18414. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18414. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation on health-related quality of life, lung function, exercise tolerance, and dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder patients in a tertiary care center in South India.在印度南部一家三级医疗中心,家庭肺康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康相关生活质量、肺功能、运动耐力和呼吸困难的影响。
Lung India. 2021 May-Jun;38(3):211-215. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_895_20.
3
Inhaled chemotherapy adverse effects: mechanisms and protection methods.吸入性化疗的不良反应:机制与防护方法
Lung Cancer Manag. 2020 Jan 16;8(4):LMT19. doi: 10.2217/lmt-2019-0007.
4
Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Are Cardiovascular Comorbidities and Outcomes Taken into Account?-A Systematic Review.慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的运动训练:是否考虑了心血管合并症和结局?-一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 13;8(9):1458. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091458.

改良肺康复对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of modified pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trail.

作者信息

Xu Jingjuan, He Shengnan, Han Ying, Pan Jingya, Cao Ling

机构信息

Department of Scientific Research and Education, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Respiratory Diseases, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Jun 27;4(3):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.011. eCollection 2017 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.011
PMID:31406744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6626181/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effects of modified pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

A total of 125 patients (63 in the PR group and 62 in the control group) were recruited in this study. The patients in the PR group received 12 weeks of conventional treatment, nursing, and modified pulmonary rehabilitation, while the patients in the control group underwent 12 weeks of conventional treatment, nursing, pursed-lip breathing training, and abdominal breathing training. Baseline characteristics, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the six-minute walk test (6MWT), modified medical research council (MMRC) dyspnea scale, and lung function were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients (58 patients in the PR group and 54 patients in the control group) completed the 12-week monitoring and follow-up. The SGRQ scores, symptoms (54.933 ± 11.900), activity (52.644 ± 14.334), impact (55.400 ± 9.905), and total score (54.655 ± 10.681) of the PR group did not significantly differ in pre- and post-treatments ( < 0.05). No significant change was also observed in the control group ( > 0.05). 6MWT [(372.089 ± 67.149) m] was significantly improved in the PR group ( < 0.05) but was not significantly different in the control group ( > 0.05). MMRC (actual rank sum 1719, rank sum 2047.5) was significantly reduced in the PR group ( < 0.05) but not in the control group ( > 0.05). The lung function (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEV1% and PEF) of the patients in both groups did not significantly change ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Modified PR reduces the symptoms of dyspnea, increases exercise capacity, and improves the quality of life of patients with moderate to severe COPD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估改良肺康复(PR)对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的影响。

方法

本研究共招募了125例患者(PR组63例,对照组62例)。PR组患者接受为期12周的常规治疗、护理及改良肺康复,而对照组患者接受为期12周的常规治疗、护理、缩唇呼吸训练及腹式呼吸训练。比较两组患者的基线特征、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)、改良医学研究委员会(MMRC)呼吸困难量表及肺功能。

结果

共有112例患者(PR组58例,对照组54例)完成了12周的监测与随访。PR组治疗前后SGRQ评分、症状(54.933±11.900)、活动(52.644±14.334)、影响(55.400±9.905)及总分(54.655±10.681)差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组也未观察到显著变化(P>0.05)。PR组6MWT[(372.089±67.149)m]显著改善(P<0.05),而对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PR组MMRC(实际秩和1719,秩和2047.5)显著降低(P<0.05),对照组则无明显变化(P>0.05)。两组患者的肺功能(FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、FEV1%及PEF)均无显著变化(P>0.05)。

结论

改良肺康复可减轻中重度COPD患者的呼吸困难症状,提高运动能力,改善生活质量。