Xu Jingjuan, He Shengnan, Han Ying, Pan Jingya, Cao Ling
Department of Scientific Research and Education, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Respiratory Diseases, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changzhou, People's Republic of China.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Jun 27;4(3):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.011. eCollection 2017 Jul 10.
This study aimed to assess the effects of modified pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
A total of 125 patients (63 in the PR group and 62 in the control group) were recruited in this study. The patients in the PR group received 12 weeks of conventional treatment, nursing, and modified pulmonary rehabilitation, while the patients in the control group underwent 12 weeks of conventional treatment, nursing, pursed-lip breathing training, and abdominal breathing training. Baseline characteristics, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the six-minute walk test (6MWT), modified medical research council (MMRC) dyspnea scale, and lung function were compared between the two groups.
A total of 112 patients (58 patients in the PR group and 54 patients in the control group) completed the 12-week monitoring and follow-up. The SGRQ scores, symptoms (54.933 ± 11.900), activity (52.644 ± 14.334), impact (55.400 ± 9.905), and total score (54.655 ± 10.681) of the PR group did not significantly differ in pre- and post-treatments ( < 0.05). No significant change was also observed in the control group ( > 0.05). 6MWT [(372.089 ± 67.149) m] was significantly improved in the PR group ( < 0.05) but was not significantly different in the control group ( > 0.05). MMRC (actual rank sum 1719, rank sum 2047.5) was significantly reduced in the PR group ( < 0.05) but not in the control group ( > 0.05). The lung function (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEV1% and PEF) of the patients in both groups did not significantly change ( > 0.05).
Modified PR reduces the symptoms of dyspnea, increases exercise capacity, and improves the quality of life of patients with moderate to severe COPD.
本研究旨在评估改良肺康复(PR)对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的影响。
本研究共招募了125例患者(PR组63例,对照组62例)。PR组患者接受为期12周的常规治疗、护理及改良肺康复,而对照组患者接受为期12周的常规治疗、护理、缩唇呼吸训练及腹式呼吸训练。比较两组患者的基线特征、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)、改良医学研究委员会(MMRC)呼吸困难量表及肺功能。
共有112例患者(PR组58例,对照组54例)完成了12周的监测与随访。PR组治疗前后SGRQ评分、症状(54.933±11.900)、活动(52.644±14.334)、影响(55.400±9.905)及总分(54.655±10.681)差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组也未观察到显著变化(P>0.05)。PR组6MWT[(372.089±67.149)m]显著改善(P<0.05),而对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PR组MMRC(实际秩和1719,秩和2047.5)显著降低(P<0.05),对照组则无明显变化(P>0.05)。两组患者的肺功能(FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、FEV1%及PEF)均无显著变化(P>0.05)。
改良肺康复可减轻中重度COPD患者的呼吸困难症状,提高运动能力,改善生活质量。