• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国主动脉瓣狭窄管理的当代趋势

Contemporary trends in the management of aortic stenosis in the USA.

作者信息

Alkhouli Mohamad, Alqahtani Fahad, Ziada Khaled M, Aljohani Sami, Holmes David R, Mathew Verghese

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Drive, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First St. SW Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2020 Feb 21;41(8):921-928. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz568.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz568
PMID:31408096
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the contemporary trends in aortic stenosis (AS) interventions in the USA before and after the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We utilized the National-Inpatient-Sample to assess temporal trends in the incidence, cost, and outcomes of AS interventions between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2016. During the study's period, AS interventions increased from 96 to 137 per 100 000 individuals > 60 years old, P < 0.001. In-hospital expenditure on AS interventions increased from $2.28 billion in 2003 to $4.33 in 2016 P < 0.001. Among patients who underwent aortic valve replacement, the proportion of TAVI increased from 11.9% in 2012 to 43.2% in 2016 (P < 0.001). Males and Hispanics had lower proportions of TAVI compared with females and White patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality of isolated SAVR decreased from 5.4% in 2003 to 3.3% in 2016 (P < 0.001), whereas adjusted in-hospital mortality of TAVI decreased from 4.7% in 2012 to 2.2% in 2016, P < 0.001. The incidence of new dialysis, permanent pacemaker implantation, and blood transfusion decreased after both TAVI and SAVR between 2012 and 2016. However, the rate of post-operative stroke did not significantly decrease. Length of stay and cost of hospitalization decreased after both SAVR and TAVI, although the later remained higher with TAVI. Rates of non-home discharge decreased over time after TAVI but remained stable after isolated SAVR.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide survey documents the increasing incidence of AS interventions, the rising cost of modern AS care, and the paradigm shift in aortic valve replacement practice in the USA.

摘要

目的

评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)引入前后美国主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)干预措施的当代趋势。

方法与结果

我们利用全国住院患者样本评估2003年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间AS干预措施的发生率、成本和结局的时间趋势。在研究期间,60岁以上人群中AS干预措施的发生率从每10万人96例增加到137例,P<0.001。AS干预措施的住院费用从2003年的22.8亿美元增加到2016年的43.3亿美元,P<0.001。在接受主动脉瓣置换术的患者中,TAVI的比例从2012年的11.9%增加到2016年的43.2%(P<0.001)。与女性和白人患者相比,男性和西班牙裔患者接受TAVI的比例较低。单纯外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的校正住院死亡率从2003年的5.4%降至2016年的3.3%(P<0.001),而TAVI的校正住院死亡率从2012年的4.7%降至2016年的2.2%,P<0.001。2012年至2016年期间,TAVI和SAVR后新透析、永久性起搏器植入和输血的发生率均下降。然而,术后中风发生率并未显著下降。SAVR和TAVI后住院时间和住院费用均下降,尽管TAVI的住院时间和费用仍较高。TAVI后非回家出院率随时间下降,但单纯SAVR后保持稳定。

结论

这项全国性调查记录了美国AS干预措施发生率的增加、现代AS治疗成本的上升以及主动脉瓣置换实践的模式转变。

相似文献

1
Contemporary trends in the management of aortic stenosis in the USA.美国主动脉瓣狭窄管理的当代趋势
Eur Heart J. 2020 Feb 21;41(8):921-928. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz568.
2
Clinical End Points of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients <65 Years of Age (From the National Inpatient Sample Database).年龄<65岁患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的临床终点比较(来自国家住院患者样本数据库)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.356. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis (SAVR): A Cost-Comparison Study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)与主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的成本比较研究。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Dec;30(12):1918-1928. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.05.088. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Short-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Kidney Transplant Recipients (from the US Nationwide Representative Study).肾移植受者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的短期结局(来自美国全国代表性研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;144:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.048. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
5
Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后与外科主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的起搏特点及当前起搏实践模式比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):E385-E390. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27915. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Comparison of Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients ≥80 Years of Age.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在≥80 岁患者中的结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;123(11):1853-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis.经导管与外科主动脉瓣植入术治疗肝硬化患者主动脉瓣狭窄的疗效
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1193-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.067. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
8
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States (From the Nationwide Readmission Database).经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在美国的比较(来自全国再入院数据库)。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;148:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.031. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
9
Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis Before and During the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术时代前后严重主动脉瓣狭窄的主动脉瓣置换术。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;126:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.038. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment disparities and prognostic implications in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians with high-gradient severe aortic stenosis.高龄与非高龄高梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗差异及预后影响
Open Heart. 2025 Aug 14;12(2):e003405. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003405.
2
Temporal trends in TAVI outcomes: experience from an Irish tertiary referral centre.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗结果的时间趋势:来自爱尔兰一家三级转诊中心的经验
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04001-7.
3
Sex-Associated Disparities in Surgical and Percutaneous Management of Aortic Stenosis With Severe Features: Retrospective Analysis From the National Readmission Database.
具有严重特征的主动脉瓣狭窄的手术和经皮治疗中的性别差异:来自国家再入院数据库的回顾性分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e038463. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038463. Epub 2025 May 15.
4
A New Benchmark for Modern Management of Valvular Heart Disease: The Whole-Life Cycle Management System.心脏瓣膜病现代管理的新基准:全生命周期管理系统
JACC Asia. 2025 May;5(5):609-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.01.017. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
5
Genetic factors and management strategies in aortic health: a literature review of inherited aortopathy.主动脉健康中的遗传因素与管理策略:遗传性主动脉病变的文献综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Dec 12;87(2):598-615. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002969. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Prognostic Value and Safety of Serial Exercise Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.连续运动超声心动图在无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄中的预后价值及安全性
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 7;14(1):e036599. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036599. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
7
The role of pre-existing left-sided valvular heart disease in the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction.既往存在的左侧心脏瓣膜病在急性心肌梗死患者预后中的作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 19;11:1465723. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1465723. eCollection 2024.
8
Mechanical Valves: Past, Present, and Future-A Review.机械瓣膜:过去、现在与未来——综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):3768. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133768.
9
The Heart Brain Team and Patient-Centered Management of Ischemic Stroke.心脏-脑卒中介入团队与缺血性脑卒中的以患者为中心的管理
JACC Adv. 2022 Mar 16;1(1):100014. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100014. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Score for Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后再入院的机器学习评分的开发与验证
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug 26;1(3):100060. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100060. eCollection 2022 Aug.